SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Quality assessment of controlled clinical trials published in Orthopaedics and Traumatology journals in Spanish: An observational study through handsearching and evidence mapping
16 references·0 citing·34 second hopsampled
Quality assessment of controlled clinical trials published in Orthopaedics and Traumatology journals in Spanish: An observational study through handsearching and evidence mapping (2018)Quality assessment of controlled clinical…Comparison between publicly accessible publications, registries, and protocols of phase III trials indicated persistence of selective outcome reporting (2017)Comparison between publicly a…CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updat…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…The Quality of Reporting of Orthopaedic Randomized Trials with Use of a Checklist for Nonpharmacological Therapies (2007)The Quality of Reporting of O…Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials (2007)Handsearching versus electron…A Quality Assessment of Randomized Clinical Trials in Pediatric Orthopaedics (2007)A Quality Assessment of Rando…Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials? (2006)Does a "Level I Evidence" rat…Which resources should be used to identify RCT/CCTs for systematic reviews: a systematic review (2005)Which resources should be use…Methodological Differences in Clinical Trials Evaluating Nonpharmacological and Pharmacological Treatments of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis (2003)Methodological Differences in…USERʼS GUIDE TO THE ORTHOPAEDIC LITERATURE (2002)USERʼS GUIDE TO THE ORTHOPAED…THE QUALITY OF REPORTING OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY FROM 1988 THROUGH 2000 (2002)THE QUALITY OF REPORTING OF R…A comparison of handsearching versus MEDLINE searching to identify reports of randomized controlled trials (2002)A comparison of handsearching…Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies (1998)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making (2010)Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews (2010)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts (2017)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)The Cochrane Collaboration (1995)Registering Clinical Trials (2003)Is the coverage of google scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews (2013)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Scales to Assess the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review (2007)Methods and Processes of the CONSORT Group: Example of an Extension for Trials Assessing Nonpharmacologic Treatments (2008)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies (2014)STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies (2015)Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) (2016)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement84,364 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement37,718 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,382 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,387 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration10,425 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials1,019 cited
  • 2007Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials258 cited
  • 2002THE QUALITY OF REPORTING OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY FROM 1988 THROUGH 2000243 cited
  • 2003Methodological Differences in Clinical Trials Evaluating Nonpharmacological and Pharmacological Treatments of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis160 cited
  • 2002A comparison of handsearching versus MEDLINE searching to identify reports of randomized controlled trials117 cited
  • 2006Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials?99 cited
  • 2005Which resources should be used to identify RCT/CCTs for systematic reviews: a systematic review95 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2007
The Quality of Reporting of Orthopaedic Randomized Trials with Use of a Checklist for Nonpharmacological Therapies
85 cited
  • 2007A Quality Assessment of Randomized Clinical Trials in Pediatric Orthopaedics46 cited
  • 2017Comparison between publicly accessible publications, registries, and protocols of phase III trials indicated persistence of selective outcome reporting41 cited
  • 2002USERʼS GUIDE TO THE ORTHOPAEDIC LITERATURE38 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.