SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
CHIMERAS showed better inter-rater reliability and inter-consensus reliability than GRADE in grading quality of evidence: A randomized controlled trial
16 references·0 citing·47 second hopsampled
CHIMERAS showed better inter-rater reliability and inter-consensus reliability than GRADE in grading quality of evidence: A randomized controlled trial (2018)CHIMERAS showed better inter-rater reliab…The quality of evidence in Chinese meta-analyses needs to be improved (2016)The quality of evidence in Ch…Outcomes in systematic reviews of complex interventions never reached “high” GRADE ratings when compared with those of simple interventions (2016)Outcomes in systematic review…High quality of the evidence for medical and other health-related interventions was uncommon in Cochrane systematic reviews (2016)High quality of the evidence …An algorithm was developed to assign GRADE levels of evidence to comparisons within systematic reviews (2015)An algorithm was developed to…Methodological considerations of the GRADE method (2014)Methodological considerations…A checklist designed to aid consistency and reproducibility of GRADE assessments: development and pilot validation (2014)A checklist designed to aid c…The GRADE approach is reproducible in assessing the quality of evidence of quantitative evidence syntheses (2013)The GRADE approach is reprodu…Testing the Risk of Bias tool showed low reliability between individual reviewers and across consensus assessments of reviewer pairs (2012)Testing the Risk of Bias tool…From the Trenches: A Cross-Sectional Study Applying the GRADE Tool in Systematic Reviews of Healthcare Interventions (2012)From the Trenches: A Cross-Se…Computing Inter-Rater Reliability for Observational Data: An Overview and Tutorial (2012)Computing Inter-Rater Reliabi…A confidence interval approach to sample size estimation for interobserver agreement studies with multiple raters and outcomes (2012)A confidence interval approac…GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating t…Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences (2000)Optimal number of response ca…Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. (1996)Forming inferences about some…The Effect of Number of Rating Scale Categories on Levels of Interrater Reliability : A Monte Carlo Investigation (1985)The Effect of Number of Ratin…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Perspective: NutriGrade: A Scoring System to Assess and Judge the Meta-Evidence of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies in Nutrition Research (2016)What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary (2016)Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 2—risk of bias assessment; synthesis, presentation and summary of the findings; and assessment of the certainty of the evidence (2018)Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests (1951)The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1956)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Exploring Consumer Behavior in Virtual Reality Tourism Using an Extended Stimulus-Organism-Response Model (2018)Intraclass correlation – A discussion and demonstration of basic features (2019)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder (2012)A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis (2014)Statistical principles in experimental design. (1962)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)QUANTIFYING TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY USING THE INTRACLASS CORRELATION COEFFICIENT AND THE SEM (2005)Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires (2006)A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research (2016)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision (2011)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency (2011)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. (1980)A power primer. (1992)Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) (2011)Refining the theory of basic individual values. (2012)Likert Scale: Explored and Explained (2015)Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. (1984)TWO CRITERIA FOR GOOD MEASUREMENTS IN RESEARCH: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY (2017)Reliability and Inter-rater Reliability in Qualitative Research (2019)Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines (2020)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)‘Measuring’ Physical Literacy and Related Constructs: A Systematic Review of Empirical Findings (2017)Tools for assessing risk of reporting biases in studies and syntheses of studies: a systematic review (2018)Music interventions for improving psychological and physical outcomes in people with cancer (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews from China and the USA are similar (2017)Impact of risk perception on customer purchase behavior: a meta-analysis (2019)The effectiveness of music therapy for patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis (2020)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,603 cited
  • 2011GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence8,377 cited
  • 1996Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients.6,904 cited
  • 2012Computing Inter-Rater Reliability for Observational Data: An Overview and Tutorial3,896 cited
  • 2000Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences2,158 cited
  • 2014A checklist designed to aid consistency and reproducibility of GRADE assessments: development and pilot validation612 cited
  • 2013The GRADE approach is reproducible in assessing the quality of evidence of quantitative evidence syntheses371 cited
  • 1985The Effect of Number of Rating Scale Categories on Levels of Interrater Reliability : A Monte Carlo Investigation302 cited
  • 2015An algorithm was developed to assign GRADE levels of evidence to comparisons within systematic reviews183 cited
  • 2016The quality of evidence in Chinese meta-analyses needs to be improved180 cited
  • 2012Testing the Risk of Bias tool showed low reliability between individual reviewers and across consensus assessments of reviewer pairs175 cited
  • 2012A confidence interval approach to sample size estimation for interobserver agreement studies with multiple raters and outcomes145 cited
  • 2014Methodological considerations of the GRADE method87 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2016High quality of the evidence for medical and other health-related interventions was uncommon in Cochrane systematic reviews75 cited
  • 2016Outcomes in systematic reviews of complex interventions never reached “high” GRADE ratings when compared with those of simple interventions50 cited
  • 2012From the Trenches: A Cross-Sectional Study Applying the GRADE Tool in Systematic Reviews of Healthcare Interventions38 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.