Quality management for academic laboratories: burden or boon?

Ulrich Dirnagl · Claudia Kurreck · Esmeralda Castaños‐Vélez

35 citations0/0 files storedEMBO Reports

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Management Systems and Quality Improvement Research, Science, and Academia Quality and Management Systems

Abstract

Quality management systems have a long and proven track record in many businesses and clinical research. Such systems, when adapting to academic research, have great potential to improve rigor and reproducibility. [Image: see text]

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 35 citations exist upstream.

References

20161,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility 1997Does Implementing an Effective TQM Program Actually Improve Operating Performance? Empirical Evidence from Firms That Have Won Quality Awards 2015Robust research: Institutions must do their part for reproducibility 2016How quality control could save your science 2013Quality assurance mechanisms for the unregulated research environment

Cited by

2019Understanding of researcher behavior is required to improve data reliability 2020Improving quality of preclinical academic research through auditing: A feasibility study

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.