The Why We Retweet scale

Anuja Majmundar · Jon-Patrick Allem · Tess Boley Cruz · Jennifer Beth Unger

50 citations0/0 files storedPLoS ONE

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Social Media in Health Education Media and Digital Communication Misinformation and Its Impacts

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Twitter offers a platform for rapid diffusion of information and its users' attitudes and behaviors. Insights about information propagation via retweets (the message forwarding function) offer observable explanations of ways in which modern human interactions get organized in the form of online networks, and contextualized in the form of public health, policy decisions, disaster management, and civic participation. This study conceptualized and validated the Why We Retweet Scale to contextualize retweeting behavior. OBJECTIVE: Twitter users were identified using clustering algorithms that consider a users' position in their network and invited for an online survey. Participants (N = 1433) responded to 19 questions about why they retweet. Exploratory factor Analysis (EFA) was conducted on a scale development sample (70% of original sample), which informed the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) on a scale testing sample (30% of the original sample). Varimax rotation was used to obtain a rotated factor solution, which resulted in interpretable factors. Demographic differences among scale factors were analyzed using one-way ANOVA or independent samples t-tests. RESULTS: The final model (χ221 = 28, RMSEA = .03 [90% CI, 0.00-0.06], CFA = .99, TLI = 0.99) represented a parsimonious solution with 4 factors, measured by 2-3 items each, creating a final scale consisting of 9 items. Factor labels and definitions were: (1) Show approval, "Show support to the tweeter"; (2) Argue, "To argue against a tweet that I disagree with"; (3) Gain attention, "Add followers or gain attention"; and (4) Entertain, "Create humor/amusement". Demographic differences were also reported. CONCLUSIONS: The Why We Retweet Scale offers a useful conceptualization and assessment of motivations for retweeting. In the future, communication strategists might consider the factors associated with information propagation when designing campaign messages to maximize message reach and engagement on Twitter.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 50 citations exist upstream.

References

1999Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives 1998Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling 1990Comparative fit indexes in structural models.1974An Index of Factorial Simplicity 1981Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics 2012The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?2013Why people use social media: a uses and gratifications approach 2006Congeneric and (Essentially) Tau-Equivalent Estimates of Score Reliability

Cited by

2021Crossing the chasm between green corporate image and green corporate identity: a text mining, social media-based case study on automakers 2021Health information diffusion on Twitter: The content and design of WHO tweets matter 2019Examining Public Communication About Kidney Cancer on Twitter 2020Predicting tweet impact using a novel evidential reasoning prediction method 2020Follow-Up Investigation on the Promotional Practices of Electric Scooter Companies: Content Analysis of Posts on Instagram and Twitter

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.