References

• 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
• 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation13,108 cited
• 2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies10,781 cited
• 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,605 cited
• 1986Determination and Quantification Of Content Validity6,758 cited
• 2006Computing inter‐rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement2,139 cited
• 2004Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement1,588 cited
• 2010Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines1,432 cited
• 2014Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview1,308 cited
• 2013A comparison of Cohen’s Kappa and Gwet’s AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples1,021 cited
• 2013PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts706 cited
• 2008CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration670 cited
• 1999Can it work? Does it work? Is it worth it?