Berkeley: Empiricist or Rationalist? - A Disquisition

Abstract

Principally, the onus of this research is to determine Berkeley as an empiricist or a rationalist. The thesis of the work is that he is prima facie warrantedly and justifiably, as gleaned from his philosophy, a rationalist than an empiricist. This work shall attempt an elaborate defence of this thesis in the discourse and conclude substantially on a thought provocative paradoxical note.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 0 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.