Public financial management reform: an ongoing journey towards good governance

2018-10-19articleJournal of financial reporting & accounting32 citationsgreen

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Public Policy and Administration Research Economic and Fiscal Studies Public Administration in Developing Nations

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to provide a better understanding of the influence of contextual factors on public financial management reform (PFMR) process. It provides a comprehensive analytical view of PFMR in the UAE over the period (2003-2016). Design/methodology/approach The paper is based on a case study approach as a research methodology. It draws on archival data as well as interviews with key staff of the Ministry of Finance (MoF). A contingency model is used as conceptual framework to examine PFMR in the UAE. Findings Finding of this study show that the PFMR process cannot be viewed as an isolated initiative, rather, as part of a set of broader NPM reforms to strengthen public accountability for performance. The transition process creates major organisational changes; strategy, structure (new rules and roles), culture (core values about organisational vision, mission, and objectives). Benchmarks and milestones have been set in the accompanying monitoring matrix, though in practice, delays have typically occurred in the implementation of reforms. Challenges ahead facing the MoF are addressed. Research limitations/implications The findings should be understood in the economic, social and historical contexts of the UAE. Given the narrow scope of this paper, a single case study was conducted. Crucial themes for future research including how public sector executives employ effective independent measures of outcomes. The impact of basic supporting subsystems in translating strategic priorities and integrating them into the federal budget. Practical implications Research on PFMR is inherently practical. Essential factors for successful implantation of PFMR include government strategy, regulatory framework, information communication technology, technical experience, strong leadership, long-term political and administrative commitments, strategic pre-decision control mechanisms and accurate performance measurement. Originality/value This paper contributes to the limited studies on PFMR in Middle East and North Africa (MENA) countries. Lessons of this study may be valid for other countries considering similar developments in their PFMR.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 32 citations exist upstream.

References

1991A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS?

1995The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme

2004Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis

1999Organizational Change: A Review of Theory and Research in the 1990s

1980The contingency theory of management accounting: Achievement and prognosis

2008Public sector to public services: 20 years of “contextual” accounting research

1999Institutional Strategy

1992Changes in the Public Sector: A Review of Recent “Alternative” Accounting Research

Cited by

2022Culture, language, and accounting reform: a new perspective on IPSAS implementation

2021Guest editorialHappy endings and successful stories in public sector financial management: a lesson drawing perspective

2024The integration of performance management and risk management in the public sector: an empirical case

2022Insight into the Critical Success Factors of Performance-Based Budgeting Implementation in the Public Sector for Sustainable Development in the COVID-19 Pandemic