SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Laparoscopic versus open surgery: a systematic review evaluating Cochrane systematic reviews
5 references·1 citing·27 second hop
Laparoscopic versus open surgery: a systematic review evaluating Cochrane systematic reviews (2018)Laparoscopic versus open surgery: a syste…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) (2007)External Validation of a Meas…Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Development of AMSTAR: a meas…A Comparison of the Quality of Cochrane Reviews and Systematic Reviews Published in Paper-Based Journals (2002)A Comparison of the Quality o…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…A methodological review finds mismatch between overall and pairwise overlap analysis in a sample of overviews (2023)A methodological review finds…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Child maltreatment prevention: a systematic review of reviews (2009)Online Prevention Aimed at Lifestyle Behaviors: A Systematic Review of Reviews (2013)Covidence and Rayyan (2018)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) (2016)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Validation of an index of the quality of review articles (1991)Methodological quality of systematic reviews of animal studies: a survey of reviews of basic research (2006)The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: An independent appraisal* (2007)Evidence-based or biased? The quality of published reviews of evidence-based practices (2008)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview (2014)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
  • 2007External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)569 cited
  • 2002A Comparison of the Quality of Cochrane Reviews and Systematic Reviews Published in Paper-Based Journals111 cited

Cited by

  • 2023A methodological review finds mismatch between overall and pairwise overlap analysis in a sample of overviews19 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work