SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reliability of scholarly journal acceptance rates
1 references·4 citing·22 second hop
Reliability of scholarly journal acceptance rates (2018)Reliability of scholarly journal acceptan…Journal acceptance rates: A cross-disciplinary analysis of variability and relationships with journal measures (2013)Journal acceptance rates: A c…Are there too many papers by the same authors within the same conference proceedings? Norms and extremities within the field of human–computer interaction (2025)Are there too many papers by …The dark side of publishing: Unveiling the deceptive tactics of cloned journals in India (2024)The dark side of publishing: …Reliability of Hijacked Journal Detection Based on Scientometrics, Altmetric Tools, and Web Informatics: A Case Report Using Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus (2021)Reliability of Hijacked Journ…The limitations to our understanding of peer review (2020)The limitations to our unders…Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (1985)A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science (2016)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2017)Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* (2018)A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review (2021)Hijacked journals are attacking the reliability and validity of medical research. (2015)The full story of 90 hijacked journals from August 2011 to June 2015 (2015)Hijacked Journals: An Emerging Challenge for Scholarly Publishing (2016)Prevalence of plagiarism in hijacked journals: A text similarity analysis (2024)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review (2023)Guidance for Authors, Peer Reviewers, and Editors on Use of AI, Language Models, and Chatbots (2023)The emergent role of artificial intelligence, natural learning processing, and large language models in higher education and research (2023)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (2018)The cost of deception: pseudo-journals and exploitative article processing charges (2024)The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index (2010)Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact (2013)Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013Journal acceptance rates: A cross-disciplinary analysis of variability and relationships with journal measures120 cited

Cited by

  • 2020The limitations to our understanding of peer review436 cited
  • 2024The dark side of publishing: Unveiling the deceptive tactics of cloned journals in India9 cited
  • 2021Reliability of Hijacked Journal Detection Based on Scientometrics, Altmetric Tools, and Web Informatics: A Case Report Using Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus7 cited
  • 2025Are there too many papers by the same authors within the same conference proceedings? Norms and extremities within the field of human–computer interaction5 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work