SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How arbitrary are the weights assigned to books in performance-based research funding? An empirical assessment of the weight and size of monographs in Flanders
16 references·0 citing·42 second hop
How arbitrary are the weights assigned to books in performance-based research funding? An empirical assessment of the weight and size of monographs in Flanders (2018)How arbitrary are the weights assigned to…Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: evidence from eight European countries (2018)Publication patterns in the s…Comprehensiveness of national bibliographic databases for social sciences and humanities: Findings from a European survey (2018)Comprehensiveness of national…Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities? (2018)Are book publications disappe…A comparison of cognitive and organizational classification of publications in the social sciences and humanities (2018)A comparison of cognitive and…Recognition and reward in the academy (2017)Recognition and reward in the…Taking scholarly books into account: current developments in five European countries (2016)Taking scholarly books into a…Clustering by publication patterns of senior authors in the social sciences and humanities (2016)Clustering by publication pat…Impacts of performance-based research funding systems: The case of the Norwegian Publication Indicator (2015)Impacts of performance-based …How incentives trickle down: Local use of a national bibliometric indicator system (2015)How incentives trickle down: …The objectives, design and selection process of the Flemish Academic Bibliographic Database for the Social Sciences and Humanities (VABB-SHW) (2014)The objectives, design and se…Accountability in context: effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms, and individual working routines in the faculty of Arts at Uppsala University (2014)Accountability in context: ef…One size doesn’t fit all (2012)One size doesn’t fit allChanging publication patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities, 2000–2009 (2012)Changing publication patterns…The Discipline of Rankings: Tight Coupling and Organizational Change (2009)The Discipline of Rankings: T…Mickey Mouse and Milton: book publishing in the humanities (2004)Mickey Mouse and Milton: book…The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (1986)The Intellectual and Social O…A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice (1972)Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems (1976)Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony (1977)Third mission as institutional strategies: Between isomorphic forces and heterogeneous pathways (2016)Unique, but still best practice? The Research Excellence Framework (REF) from an international perspective (2017)Multilingual publishing in the social sciences and humanities: A seven‐country European study (2020)The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields (1983)The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields (2004)A Sociology of Quantification (2008)Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers (2015)If...Then (2018)Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases (2006)Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review (2006)Performance-based university research funding systems (2011)Publication rate expressed by age, gender and academic position – A large-scale analysis of Norwegian academic staff (2015)Patterns of internationalization and criteria for research assessment in the social sciences and humanities (2016)The evolution of research activity in Spain (2002)The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation (2012)Explaining the increase in publication productivity among academic staff: a generational perspective (2015)Publication-Based Funding: The Norwegian Model (2016)Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life (1995)The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (1999)Thinking with indicators. Exploring the epistemic impacts of academic performance indicators in the life sciences (2017)Citation gaming induced by bibliometric evaluation: A country-level comparative analysis (2019)Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The Flemish Performance-based Research Funding System: A Unique Variant of the Norwegian Model (2018)National Lists of Scholarly Publication Channels: An Overview and Recommendations for Their Construction and Maintenance (2020)Bias in peer review (2012)The Norwegian Model in Norway (2018)Bibliometric analysis of support vector machines research trend: a case study in China (2019)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)Frascati Manual 2015 (2015)Journals’ instructions to authors: A cross-sectional study across scientific disciplines (2019)Professional standards in bibliometric research evaluation? A meta-evaluation of European assessment practice 2005–2019 (2020)The Four Literatures of Social Science (2006)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)Digital Technology and the Practices of Humanities Research (2019)International Norm Dynamics and Political Change (1998)The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders (1998)Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review (2003)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1986The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences1,213 cited
  • 2009The Discipline of Rankings: Tight Coupling and Organizational Change1,063 cited
  • 2018Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: evidence from eight European countries273 cited
  • 2012Changing publication patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities, 2000–2009224 cited
  • 2014Accountability in context: effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms, and individual working routines in the faculty of Arts at Uppsala University184 cited
  • 2015How incentives trickle down: Local use of a national bibliometric indicator system142 cited
  • 2015Impacts of performance-based research funding systems: The case of the Norwegian Publication Indicator134 cited
  • 2016Taking scholarly books into account: current developments in five European countries79 cited
  • 2018Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities?78 cited
  • 2018Comprehensiveness of national bibliographic databases for social sciences and humanities: Findings from a European survey70 cited
  • 2017Recognition and reward in the academy57 cited
  • 2012One size doesn’t fit all55 cited
  • 2014The objectives, design and selection process of the Flemish Academic Bibliographic Database for the Social Sciences and Humanities (VABB-SHW)42 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2004Mickey Mouse and Milton: book publishing in the humanities37 cited
  • 2016Clustering by publication patterns of senior authors in the social sciences and humanities37 cited
  • 2018A comparison of cognitive and organizational classification of publications in the social sciences and humanities36 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.