SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Retaining and Rewarding Journal Peer Reviewers · Study

WorkRetaining and Rewarding Journal Peer Reviewers

Tyler Michael Coupal2018

Work2018

Retaining and Rewarding Journal Peer Reviewers

Tyler Michael Coupal · José Florencio F. Lapeña · Wcg Peh

9 citations·0/0 files stored·Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Writing and Publishing Academic Publishing and Open Access

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 9 citations exist upstream.

References

2015Rewarding Peer Reviewers - Maintaining the Integrity of Science Communication 2017Core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals: consensus statement 2015Peer review as a business transaction 2016Rewarding peer‐review work: the Publons initiative 2016Editorial: ORCID is a Wonderful (But Not Required) Tool for Authors 2013Free for Service: The Inadequate Incentives for Quality Peer Review 2014Review rewards 2009The ‘peer reviewer as collaborator’ model for publishing

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2022Towards peer review as a group engagementarticle · 3 shared references 2025Paying reviewers and regulating the number of papers may help fix the peer-review processarticle · 3 shared references 2017The Clarivate TM Analytics acquisition of Publons – an evolution or commodification of peer review?article · 2 shared references 2023Is peer review duration shorter for attractive manuscripts?article · 2 shared references 2019A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journalsarticle · 1 shared reference 2019Journal editors’ perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative studyarticle · 1 shared reference

Details

Year2018

Typeeditorial

Published2018-11-01

VenueCanadian Association of Radiologists Journal

ISSN-L0846-5371

Languageen

Citations9

Files0 public / 0

ShelfPublishing and Scholarly Communication

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.carj.2017.12.006

openalex_workW2898934745

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.