SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Design, statistical analysis and reporting standards for test accuracy studies for infectious diseases in animals: Progress, challenges and recommendations
13 references·0 citing·42 second hop
Design, statistical analysis and reporting standards for test accuracy studies for infectious diseases in animals: Progress, challenges and recommendations (2018)Design, statistical analysis and reportin…Concerns about composite reference standards in diagnostic research (2018)Concerns about composite refe…STARD-BLCM: Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy studies that use Bayesian Latent Class Models (2017)STARD-BLCM: Standards for the…STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration (2016)STARD 2015 guidelines for rep…Bias due to composite reference standards in diagnostic accuracy studies (2015)Bias due to composite referen…Understanding the Direction of Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2013)Understanding the Direction o…Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy (2013)Systematic reviews and meta-a…Latent Class Models in Diagnostic Studies When There is No Reference Standard--A Systematic Review (2013)Latent Class Models in Diagno…Quantifying the Accuracy of a Diagnostic Test or Marker (2012)Quantifying the Accuracy of a…QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for …Consensus-based reporting standards for diagnostic test accuracy studies for paratuberculosis in ruminants (2011)Consensus-based reporting sta…The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration (2003)The STARD statement for repor…The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)The development of QUADAS: a …Using a combination of reference tests to assess the accuracy of a new diagnostic test (1999)Using a combination of refere…Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Systematic review or meta-analysis? Their place in the evidence hierarchy (2013)Diagnostic test accuracy (2015)How useful is the center for epidemiologic studies depression scale in screening for depression in adults? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis✰ (2021)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Development of practical recommendations for diagnostic accuracy studies in low-prevalence situations (2019)Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard – An update (2019)Recognising Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests Part 1: Patient Selection (2019)Analysing and Presenting Results (2010)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (Chinese edition) (2009)Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed (2011)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. (2003)Systematic Reviews of Studies Quantifying the Accuracy of Diagnostic Tests and Markers (2012)Facilitating Prospective Registration of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A STARD Initiative (2017)Targeted test evaluation: a framework for designing diagnostic accuracy studies with clear study hypotheses (2019)Exploratory Latent Structure Analysis Using Both Identifiable and Unidentifiable Models (1974)Latent Class Analysis (1987)Evaluation of diagnostic tests when there is no gold standard. A review of methods (2007)What Is the Optimal Cut-Off Point of the 10-Item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale for Screening Depression Among Chinese Individuals Aged 45 and Over? An Exploration Using Latent Profile Analysis (2022)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)Development and validation of a risk-of-bias tool for assessing in vitro studies conducted in dentistry: The QUIN (2022)STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2015)Reporting guidelines for diagnostic accuracy studies that use Bayesian latent class models (STARD‐BLCM) (2017)Gold standards are out and Bayes is in: Implementing the cure for imperfect reference tests in diagnostic accuracy studies (2019)Invited review: Completeness of reporting of experiments: REFLECTing on a year of animal trials in the Journal of Dairy Science (2019)Use of Expert Panels to Define the Reference Standard in Diagnostic Research: A Systematic Review of Published Methods and Reporting (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies14,163 cited
  • 2003The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews3,593 cited
  • 2016STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration2,564 cited
  • 2003The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration1,214 cited
  • 2013Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy319 cited
  • 2013Understanding the Direction of Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Test Accuracy243 cited
  • 1999Using a combination of reference tests to assess the accuracy of a new diagnostic test240 cited
  • 2017STARD-BLCM: Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy studies that use Bayesian Latent Class Models219 cited
  • 2013Latent Class Models in Diagnostic Studies When There is No Reference Standard--A Systematic Review217 cited
  • 2012Quantifying the Accuracy of a Diagnostic Test or Marker167 cited
  • 2011Consensus-based reporting standards for diagnostic test accuracy studies for paratuberculosis in ruminants83 cited
  • 2015Bias due to composite reference standards in diagnostic accuracy studies68 cited
  • 2018Concerns about composite reference standards in diagnostic research51 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work