Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Evaluation of Bluestar® Forensic Magnum and Other Traditional Blood Detection Methods on Bloodstained Wood Subjected to a Variety of Burn Conditions,

12 references·1 citing·22 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2007Forensic application of the luminol reaction as a presumptive test for latent blood detection342 cited
1986Criminal profiling from crime scene analysis323 cited
1991A Study of the Sensitivity and Specificity of Four Presumptive Tests for Blood146 cited
2006A comparison of the presumptive luminol test for blood with four non‐chemiluminescent forensic techniques118 cited
1985Motives for Arson (Fire Raising)72 cited
2012A Comparison of Chemical Enhancements for the Detection of Latent Blood,,41 cited
2008Chemical Enhancement Techniques of Bloodstain Patterns and DNA Recovery After Fire Exposure*38 cited
2012An evaluation of luminol formulations and their effect on DNA profiling32 cited
2002Accuracy, Reliability, and Safety of Luminol in Bloodstain Investigation23 cited
2017A quantitative method for determining a representative detection limit of the forensic luminol test for latent bloodstains19 cited
2006A comparative study of the sensitivity and specifity of luminal and fluorescein on diluted and aged bloodstains and subsequent STRs typing19 cited
2016Technical note: The effects of Bluestar® and luminol when used in conjunction with tetramethylbenzidine or phenolphthalein16 cited

Cited by

2020DNA and fingerprint recovery from an arson scene12 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work