SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Bibliometric differences – a case study in bibliometric evaluation across SSH and STEM
16 references·3 citing·50 second hop
Bibliometric differences – a case study in bibliometric evaluation across SSH and STEM (2018)Bibliometric differences – a case study i…Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime data (2018)Do altmetrics correlate with …Applied Evaluative Informetrics (2017)Applied Evaluative Informetri…Using Google Scholar in research evaluation of humanities and social science programs: A comparison with Web of Science data (2016)Using Google Scholar in resea…A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)A review of the literature on…The operationalization of “fields” as WoS subject categories ( WC s) in evaluative bibliometrics: The cases of “library and information science” and “science & technology studies” (2015)The operationalization of “fi…Multidimensional assessment of scholarly research impact (2015)Multidimensional assessment o…Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)Google Scholar, Scopus and th…Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Man…A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)A review of theory and practi…Are 'STEM from Mars and SSH from Venus'?: Challenging disciplinary stereotypes of research's social value (2013)Are 'STEM from Mars and SSH f…Introducing 'productive interactions' in social impact assessment (2011)Introducing 'productive inter…A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants (2011)A multilevel meta-analysis of…Researchers’ perceptions of citations (2009)Researchers’ perceptions of c…Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis: From the Science Citation Index to Cybermetrics (2009)Bibliometrics and Citation An…Citation analysis (2007)Citation analysisThe use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research (1996)The use of multiple indicator…Ukrainian arts and humanities research in Scopus: a bibliometric analysis (2023)Ukrainian arts and humanities…Towards a new generic framework for citation network generation and analysis in the humanities (2022)Towards a new generic framewo…A map of Digital Humanities research across bibliographic data sources (2022)A map of Digital Humanities r…The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review (2001)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The Academic Ranking of World Universities (2005)Researcher and Author Impact Metrics: Variety, Value, and Context (2018)Do altmetrics assess societal impact in a comparable way to case studies? An empirical test of the convergent validity of altmetrics based on data from the UK research excellence framework (REF) (2019)Guidelines for Theory Selection: The IMPACT Framework (2025)Fourth-Generation Evaluation (1988)Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts (1997)The Research Excellence Framework and the 'impact agenda': are we creating a Frankenstein monster? (2011)Fourth Generation Evaluation (2014)Does Interdisciplinary Research Lead to Higher Citation Impact? The Different Effect of Proximal and Distal Interdisciplinarity (2015)Innovation policy: what, why, and how (2017)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The fifth discipline, the art and practice of the learning organization (1991)Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)Bibliometric indicators: opportunities and limits (2015)A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science (2016)Forty years of the European Journal of Operational Research: A bibliometric overview (2017)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (1964)Assessing basic research (1983)Bibliometric Indicators and Analysis of Research Systems (1997)Evaluación de la actividad científica a través de indicadores bibliométricos (1999)The rise and rise of citation analysis (2007)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)A review of the characteristics of 108 author-level bibliometric indicators (2014)Professional and citizen bibliometrics: complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators—a state-of-the-art report (2016)The application of meta-analytic (multi-level) models with multiple random effects: A systematic review (2020)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2021)THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1963)Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts (1986)Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society (1988)Mapping research specialties (2008)Field-normalized citation impact indicators and the choice of an appropriate counting method (2015)Exploratory Research (2020)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting (2016)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time (2023)Bibliometrics of social media research: A co-citation and co-word analysis (2017)The circular economy umbrella: Trends and gaps on integrating pathways (2017)Knowledge mapping of platform research: a visual analysis using VOSviewer and CiteSpace (2020)Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers (2020)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics2,816 cited
  • 2015Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison1,783 cited
  • 2016A review of the literature on citation impact indicators1,344 cited
  • 2015A review of theory and practice in scientometrics1,000 cited
  • 2009Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis: From the Science Citation Index to Cybermetrics541 cited
  • 2011Introducing 'productive interactions' in social impact assessment520 cited
  • 1996The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research356 cited
  • 2011A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants290 cited
  • 2007Citation analysis290 cited
  • 2015Multidimensional assessment of scholarly research impact167 cited
  • 2017Applied Evaluative Informetrics153 cited
  • 2018Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime data142 cited
  • 2009Researchers’ perceptions of citations134 cited
  • 2015The operationalization of “fields” as WoS subject categories ( WC s) in evaluative bibliometrics: The cases of “library and information science” and “science & technology studies”129 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2016
Using Google Scholar in research evaluation of humanities and social science programs: A comparison with Web of Science data
113 cited
  • 2013Are 'STEM from Mars and SSH from Venus'?: Challenging disciplinary stereotypes of research's social value108 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2022A map of Digital Humanities research across bibliographic data sources22 cited
    • 2023Ukrainian arts and humanities research in Scopus: a bibliometric analysis10 cited
    • 2022Towards a new generic framework for citation network generation and analysis in the humanities10 cited