What 4′33″ also Is: A Response to Dodd

Abstract

Julian Dodd [2018] persuasively argues that John Cage’s 4′33″ should be characterised as (1) a silent piece, as opposed to a sonically replete piece, containing the environmental sounds that occur as it is performed; (2) a piece of performance art, but not a piece of music; (3) a work of conceptual art. While I agree with Dodd’s claims, I contend that he fails to account for two features of 4′33″. I argue that a qualified description of Cage’s work as belonging to a subgenre of conceptual art could address these shortcomings.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 4 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.