Review as a procedure of expert evaluation of the quality of scientific articles

Андрей Киричек · Andrey Victorovich Kirichek · Valeriy Spasennikov

9 citations0/0 files storedErgodesign

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Writing and Publishing Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

The necessity of unification of the form of review in the process of decision-making on the publication of articles in scientific journals is explained. The experience of peer review of manuscripts in domestic scientific journals is summarized. The criteria for assessing the quality of scientific articles, a unified form of review-questionnaire, as well as examples of its application are proposed.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 9 citations exist upstream.

References

2017ANALYSIS OF INVENTION PATENTING DYNAMICS IN SPHERE OF HUMAN LIFE NEEDS SATISFACTION

Cited by

2019Discussion issues of evaluation of the scientific activity’s effectiveness using citation indices (review of domestic and foreign publications)2020Scientific article as a means of effective communication: recommendations for writing and formatting

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.