The Effects of Critical Audit Matter Removal and Duration on Jurors' Assessments of Auditor Negligence

Jeremy M. Vinson · Jesse C. Robertson · R. Cameron Cockrell

72 citations0/0 files storedAuditing A Journal of Practice & Theory

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance Corporate Governance and Financial Management Jury Decision Making Processes

Abstract

A primary concern facing the PCAOB's requirement of disclosing critical audit matters (CAMs) is increased auditor litigation risk. Evidence with Key Audit Matters from the U.K. indicates auditors may subsequently remove a CAM or continue to report the same CAM for several years. Therefore, we investigate the effects of CAM removal and duration on jurors' assessments of auditor negligence when there is a subsequent material misstatement due to fraud in the account related to the CAM. Using the Culpable Control Model, we predict jurors will assess higher auditor negligence when a CAM is removed than when a CAM is reported and when a CAM is reported for multiple years than for one year. Results of our first experiment, in which the CAM relates to a more complex account, highlight a quandary auditors could face in the years subsequent to reporting a CAM such that removal of a CAM that had been reported for multiple years increases auditor liability. Results of our second experiment, in which the CAM relates to a less complex account, provides limited support that CAM removal increases liability. Our results should be of interest to academics, practitioners, and regulators regarding legal implications of the new CAM standard.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 72 citations exist upstream.

References

2004Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods 2016The Online Laboratory: Conducting Experiments in a Real Labor Market∗1997Decision Affect Theory: Emotional Reactions to the Outcomes of Risky Options 2016Risk Disclosure Preceding Negative Outcomes: The Effects of Reporting Critical Audit Matters on Judgments of Auditor Liability 2016The Effects of Critical Audit Matter Paragraphs and Accounting Standard Precision on Auditor Liability 2000The Effects of Audit Quality and Consequence Severity on Juror Evaluations of Auditor Responsibility for Plaintiff Losses 2006It’s all about audit quality: Perspectives on strategic-systems auditing 2001Improving Jurors' Evaluations of Auditors in Negligence Cases

Cited by

2021Do key audit matters (KAMs) matter? Auditors’ perceptions of KAMs and audit quality in Finland 2021The Effects of the Internal Control Opinion and Use of Audit Data Analytics on Perceptions of Audit Quality, Assurance, and Auditor Negligence 2021The effects of disclosing critical audit matters and auditor tenure on nonprofessional investors’ judgments 2020Changes in audit effort and changes in auditors’ disclosures of risks of material misstatement

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.