Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Continued Citation of Retracted Radiation Oncology Literature—Do We Have a Problem?

16 references·14 citing·51 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2016Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study766 cited
2006Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science751 cited
2009How citation distortions create unfounded authority: analysis of a citation network498 cited
2012A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature355 cited
2016The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications287 cited
1998Phenomena of Retraction230 cited
2006Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case199 cited
2017Post retraction citations in context: a case study191 cited
1990The Continued Use of Retracted, Invalid Scientific Literature188 cited
2017Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission162 cited
2011Retractions in the medical literature: how many patients are put at risk by flawed research?156 cited
2016The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles153 cited
2005Stochastic modeling of citation slips134 cited
2008Empirical developments in retraction91 cited
2014

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

The (lack of) Impact of Retraction on Citation Networks

89 cited

2017Retractions in cancer research: a systematic survey83 cited

Cited by

2020The continued citation of retracted publications in dentistry33 cited
2023Evolution of retracted publications in the medical sciences: Citations analysis, bibliometrics, and altmetrics trends29 cited
2024Retracted articles in scientific literature: A bibliometric analysis from 2003 to 2022 using the Web of Science29 cited
2022A randomized trial alerting authors, with or without coauthors or editors, that research they cited in systematic reviews and guidelines has been retracted26 cited
2020For how long and with what relevance do genetics articles retracted due to research misconduct remain active in the scientific literature21 cited
2022Do retraction practices work effectively? Evidence from citations of psychological retracted articles20 cited
2023The spread of retracted research into policy literature20 cited
2021More consideration is needed for retracted non-Cochrane systematic reviews in medicine: a systematic review20 cited
2021Significance and implications of accurate and proper citations in clinical research studies18 cited
2024On the shoulders of fallen giants: What do references to retracted research tell us about citation behaviors?16 cited
2021Recommendations from the Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: Shaping a Research and Implementation Agenda Project13 cited
2022Retracted systematic reviews continued to be frequently cited: a citation analysis13 cited
2022Exploring perception of retraction based on mentioned status in post-retraction citations11 cited
2023How do tweeters feel about scientific misinformation: an infoveillance sentiment analysis of tweets on retraction notices and retracted papers10 cited