SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematic review methods for the Pregnancy and Birth to 24 Months Project
3 references·1 citing·13 second hop
Systematic review methods for the Pregnancy and Birth to 24 Months Project (2018)Systematic review methods for the Pregnan…Human development report 2015: work for human development (2015)Human development report 2015…USDA Nutrition Evidence Library: methodology used to identify topics and develop systematic review questions for the birth-to–24-mo population (2014)USDA Nutrition Evidence Libra…Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013)Finding What Works in Health …Perspective: USDA Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review Methodology: Grading the Strength of Evidence in Nutrition- and Public Health–Related Systematic Reviews (2021)Perspective: USDA Nutrition E…The Race between Education and Technology (2010)The second machine age: work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies (2015)The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? (2016)The SWPER index for women's empowerment in Africa: development and validation of an index based on survey data (2017)Thinking Inside the Box: A Closer Look at Financial Inclusion and Household Income (2017)Place attachment, host–tourist interactions, and residents’ attitudes towards tourism development: the case of Boa Vista Island in Cape Verde (2018)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency (2011)Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada (2015)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)The Cambridge Handbook of Infant Development (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews949 cited
  • 2015Human development report 2015: work for human development675 cited
  • 2014USDA Nutrition Evidence Library: methodology used to identify topics and develop systematic review questions for the birth-to–24-mo population61 cited

Cited by

  • 2021Perspective: USDA Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review Methodology: Grading the Strength of Evidence in Nutrition- and Public Health–Related Systematic Reviews18 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work