SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Bubble effect: including internet search engines in systematic reviews introduces selection bias and impedes scientific reproducibility
12 references·10 citing·48 second hop
Bubble effect: including internet search engines in systematic reviews introduces selection bias and impedes scientific reproducibility (2018)Bubble effect: including internet search …Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies (2018)Defining the process to liter…Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? We are not sure (2018)Are systematic reviews and me…Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study (2017)Optimal database combinations…A rapid method to increase transparency and efficiency in web-based searches (2017)A rapid method to increase tr…A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)A manifesto for reproducible …A comparison of results of empirical studies of supplementary search techniques and recommendations in review methodology handbooks: a methodological review (2017)A comparison of results of em…Searching and synthesising ‘grey literature’ and ‘grey information’ in public health: critical reflections on three case studies (2016)Searching and synthesising ‘g…Exploring issues in the conduct of website searching and other online sources for systematic reviews: how can we be systematic? (2016)Exploring issues in the condu…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits (2013)Searching for grey literature…The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You (2011)The Filter Bubble: What the I…Analysis of the reporting of search strategies in Cochrane systematic reviews (2009)Analysis of the reporting of …Feasibility and desirability of screening search results from Google Search exhaustively for systematic reviews: A cross‐case analysis (2023)Feasibility and desirability …Scoping review and characteristics of publicly available checklists for assessing clinical trial feasibility (2022)Scoping review and characteri…Evaluating YouTube as a Patient Information Source for the Risks of Root Canal Treatment (2022)Evaluating YouTube as a Patie…What you see depends on where you sit: The effect of geographical location on web‐searching for systematic reviews: A case study (2021)What you see depends on where…Solo but Not Alone: Self-Directed Online Peer Education as a Way to Increase Professional Knowledge and Skills (2021)Solo but Not Alone: Self-Dire…Literature searching methods or guidance and their application to public health topics: A narrative review (2021)Literature searching methods …Do governments care about socioeconomic inequalities in health? Narrative review of reports of EU‐15 countries (2021)Do governments care about soc…Searching for Programme theories for a realist evaluation: a case study comparing an academic database search and a simple Google search (2020)Searching for Programme theor…In search of better science: on the epistemic costs of systematic reviews and the need for a pluralistic stance to literature search (2019)In search of better science: …Characteristics, trend, and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in nuclear medicine (2019)Characteristics, trend, and m…Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? (2000)Grey literature: An important resource in systematic reviews (2017)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)Education for AI, not AI for Education: The Role of Education and Ethics in National AI Policy Strategies (2021)Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews (2022)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future? (2013)How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: a five-step approach (part 1/3) (2016)Sleep in schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of polysomnographic findings in case-control studies (2016)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)A Systematic Review of the Benefits of Hiring People with Disabilities (2018)Developing Behavior Change Interventions for Self-Management in Chronic Illness (2018)Extreme events and gender-based violence: a mixed-methods systematic review (2022)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (2010)Software support for environmental evidence synthesis (2018)How do Cochrane authors conduct web searching to identify studies? Findings from a cross‐sectional sample of Cochrane Reviews (2020)Principles and framework for assessing the risk of bias for studies included in comparative quantitative environmental systematic reviews (2022)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences (2018)The preregistration revolution (2018)Sustainable data analysis with Snakemake (2021)Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources (2005)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Beyond Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: An evaluation of the backward and forward citation coverage of 59 databases' citation indices (2024)Guidance on terminology, application, and reporting of citation searching: the TARCiS statement (2024)How to search for literature in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A comprehensive step-by-step guide (2024)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research (2019)The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research (2020)What are the barriers, facilitators and interventions targeting help-seeking behaviours for common mental health problems in adolescents? A systematic review (2020)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews (2021)The Science of Literature Reviews: Searching, Identifying, Selecting, and Synthesising (2023)Types of scenario planning and their effectiveness: A review of reviews (2023)Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook (2015)Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption (2016)Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation13,108 cited
  • 2011The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You4,429 cited
  • 2017A manifesto for reproducible science3,368 cited
  • 2017Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study2,104 cited
  • 2013Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits814 cited
  • 2018Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies561 cited
  • 2016Searching and synthesising ‘grey literature’ and ‘grey information’ in public health: critical reflections on three case studies486 cited
  • 2017A comparison of results of empirical studies of supplementary search techniques and recommendations in review methodology handbooks: a methodological review137 cited
  • 2009Analysis of the reporting of search strategies in Cochrane systematic reviews137 cited
  • 2017A rapid method to increase transparency and efficiency in web-based searches129 cited
  • 2016Exploring issues in the conduct of website searching and other online sources for systematic reviews: how can we be systematic?121 cited
  • 2018Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? We are not sure88 cited

Cited by

  • 2021Literature searching methods or guidance and their application to public health topics: A narrative review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

44 cited
  • 2023Feasibility and desirability of screening search results from Google Search exhaustively for systematic reviews: A cross‐case analysis40 cited
  • 2021What you see depends on where you sit: The effect of geographical location on web‐searching for systematic reviews: A case study29 cited
  • 2019In search of better science: on the epistemic costs of systematic reviews and the need for a pluralistic stance to literature search26 cited
  • 2022Evaluating YouTube as a Patient Information Source for the Risks of Root Canal Treatment22 cited
  • 2020Searching for Programme theories for a realist evaluation: a case study comparing an academic database search and a simple Google search20 cited
  • 2021Do governments care about socioeconomic inequalities in health? Narrative review of reports of EU‐15 countries16 cited
  • 2022Scoping review and characteristics of publicly available checklists for assessing clinical trial feasibility9 cited
  • 2019Characteristics, trend, and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in nuclear medicine7 cited
  • 2021Solo but Not Alone: Self-Directed Online Peer Education as a Way to Increase Professional Knowledge and Skills1 cited