SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Publications Are Not the Finish Line: Focusing on Societal Rather Than Publication Impact
10 references·1 citing·46 second hop
Publications Are Not the Finish Line: Focusing on Societal Rather Than Publication Impact (2018)Publications Are Not the Finish Line: Foc…Measuring scientific impact beyond academia: An assessment of existing impact metrics and proposed improvements (2017)Measuring scientific impact b…A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)A manifesto for reproducible …Lost in the citation valley (2016)Lost in the citation valleyAssessing the Societal Impact of Research: The Relational Engagement Approach (2016)Assessing the Societal Impact…1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)1,500 scientists lift the lid…The role of technology transfer offices in growing new entrepreneurial ecosystems around mid-sized universities (2015)The role of technology transf…Competitive Science: Is Competition Ruining Science? (2015)Competitive Science: Is Compe…How to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully? A proposal of methods based on percentiles of citations (2013)How to evaluate individual re…Evaluating how we evaluate (2012)Evaluating how we evaluatehg-index: a new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h- and g-indices (2009)hg-index: a new index to char…The publish or perish, publish and perish, publish then perish, and now retract and perish cultures in academia (2025)The publish or perish, publis…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2011)The operationalization of “fields” as WoS subject categories ( WC s) in evaluative bibliometrics: The cases of “library and information science” and “science & technology studies” (2015)The h-index Debate: An Introduction for Librarians (2017)Decision makings in key remanufacturing activities to optimise remanufacturing outcomes: A review (2019)Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar (2007)q2-Index: Quantitative and qualitative evaluation based on the number and impact of papers in the Hirsch core (2009)Science Mapping Analysis Software Tools: A Review (2019)A review on h-index and its alternative indices (2021)Limits to growth: in biology, small science is good science (1985)Achievement index climbs the ranks (2007)The Misused Impact Factor (2008)A Falsification of the Citation Impediment in the Taxonomic Literature (2015)From research excellence to brand relevance: A model for higher education reputation building (2016)Curriculum vitae: challenges and potential solutions (2020)Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science (1957)How to kill creativity. (1998)Creativity in context (2009)Questions About Questionable Research Practices in the Field of Management (2015)Management’s Science–Practice Gap: A Grand Challenge for All Stakeholders (2016)The career effects of scandal: Evidence from scientific retractions (2017)Whose Reality Counts?: Putting the First Last (1997)The Transformative Consumer Research Movement (2016)Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* (2018)“Real impact”: Challenges and opportunities in bridging the gap between research and practice – Making a difference in industry, policy, and society (2024)Guidelines for Theory Selection: The IMPACT Framework (2025)How to Make More Published Research True (2014)The measure of research merit (2014)The citation disadvantage of clinical research (2019)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)The preregistration revolution (2018)Sustainable data analysis with Snakemake (2021)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime data (2018)Do altmetrics assess societal impact in a comparable way to case studies? An empirical test of the convergent validity of altmetrics based on data from the UK research excellence framework (REF) (2019)Methods for mapping the impact of social sciences and humanities—A literature review (2019)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Paying peer reviewers: benefits, risks, and challenges (2026)Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences (2018)The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 20161,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility4,200 cited
  • 2017A manifesto for reproducible science3,368 cited
  • 2009hg-index: a new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h- and g-indices228 cited
  • 2017Measuring scientific impact beyond academia: An assessment of existing impact metrics and proposed improvements202 cited
  • 2016Assessing the Societal Impact of Research: The Relational Engagement Approach172 cited
  • 2013How to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully? A proposal of methods based on percentiles of citations143 cited
  • 2015Competitive Science: Is Competition Ruining Science?126 cited
  • 2012Evaluating how we evaluate26 cited
  • 2016Lost in the citation valley16 cited
  • 2015The role of technology transfer offices in growing new entrepreneurial ecosystems around mid-sized universities13 cited

Cited by

  • 2025The publish or perish, publish and perish, publish then perish, and now retract and perish cultures in academia15 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work