SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Los desafíos que enfrentan las prácticas de ciencia abierta
16 references·2 citing·52 second hop
Los desafíos que enfrentan las prácticas de ciencia abierta (2018)Los desafíos que enfrentan las prácticas …The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)The state of OA: a large-scal…The preregistration revolution (2018)The preregistration revolutionSurvey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers (2017)Survey on open peer review: A…A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review (2017)A multi-disciplinary perspect…What does research reproducibility mean? (2016)What does research reproducib…How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)How open science helps resear…1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)1,500 scientists lift the lid…The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)The Oligopoly of Academic Pub…Making Open Science a Reality (2015)Making Open Science a RealityDo “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective (2014)Do “altmetrics” correlate wit…Science Communication to the General Public: Why We Need to Teach Undergraduate and Graduate Students this Skill as Part of Their Formal Scientific Training. (2013)Science Communication to the …Too Big to Know: Rethinking Knowledge Now That the Facts Aren't the Facts, Experts Are Everywhere, and the Smartest Person in the Room Is the Room (2012)Too Big to Know: Rethinking K…Scientific collaboration (2007)Scientific collaborationAlternative Pathways in Science and Industry (2007)Alternative Pathways in Scien…Pragmatism and self-organization (2000)Pragmatism and self-organizat…Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Effect of open peer review on…Ciencia Abierta en la perspectiva de la calidad de la educación (2023)Ciencia Abierta en la perspec…Nuevos escenarios y desafíos para la ciencia abierta. Entre el optimismo y la incertidumbre (2021)Nuevos escenarios y desafíos …The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research (1968)The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. (1968)Science, Technology and Society (1992)Scientists’ collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital (2004)Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science (2005)The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity (2005)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (2000)The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing (2015)The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach (2020)A user-friendly method to merge Scopus and Web of Science data during bibliometric analysis (2021)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services (2013)Characterizing Social Media Metrics of Scholarly Papers: The Effect of Document Properties and Collaboration Patterns (2015)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Exploratory Research (2020)Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility (2014)The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2016 update (2016)A solution to minimum sample size for regressions (2020)CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)Nipype: A Flexible, Lightweight and Extensible Neuroimaging Data Processing Framework in Python (2011)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition (2018)Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011)Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 (2018)Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings (2018)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)What is research collaboration? (1997)The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations (2000)Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration (2004)Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: A correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures (2011)Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900 (2014)Climate change and tourism: a scientometric analysis using CiteSpace (2017)The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason (1975)OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard (2009)Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009 (2010)Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research (2010)Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity (2011)The future(s) of open science (2018)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences (2018)The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 20161,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility4,200 cited
  • 2018The preregistration revolution1,972 cited
  • 2016What does research reproducibility mean?1,291 cited
  • 2015The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era1,239 cited
  • 2018The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles1,217 cited
  • 2016How open science helps researchers succeed790 cited
  • 2014Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective710 cited
  • 2007Scientific collaboration615 cited
  • 2000Pragmatism and self-organization519 cited
  • 2015Making Open Science a Reality420 cited
  • 1999Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial415 cited
  • 2013Science Communication to the General Public: Why We Need to Teach Undergraduate and Graduate Students this Skill as Part of Their Formal Scientific Training.411 cited
  • 2012Too Big to Know: Rethinking Knowledge Now That the Facts Aren't the Facts, Experts Are Everywhere, and the Smartest Person in the Room Is the Room304 cited
  • 2017A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review293 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2007
Alternative Pathways in Science and Industry
278 cited
  • 2017Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers243 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023Ciencia Abierta en la perspectiva de la calidad de la educación9 cited
    • 2021Nuevos escenarios y desafíos para la ciencia abierta. Entre el optimismo y la incertidumbre7 cited