SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Biomedical authors’ awareness of publication ethics: an international survey
16 references·2 citing·49 second hop
Biomedical authors’ awareness of publication ethics: an international survey (2018)Biomedical authors’ awareness of publicat…Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication (2016)Interventions to prevent misc…How do scientists perceive the current publication culture? A qualitative focus group interview study among Dutch biomedical researchers (2016)How do scientists perceive th…Multiple Authorship in Scientific Manuscripts: Ethical Challenges, Ghost and Guest/Gift Authorship, and the Cultural/Disciplinary Perspective (2015)Multiple Authorship in Scient…China's medical research integrity questioned (2015)China's medical research inte…Publication Pressure and Scientific Misconduct in Medical Scientists (2014)Publication Pressure and Scie…Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers (2012)Peer review in a changing wor…Medical journal editors lacked familiarity with scientific publication issues despite training and regular exposure (2011)Medical journal editors lacke…A Systematic Review of Research on the Meaning, Ethics and Practices of Authorship across Scholarly Disciplines (2011)A Systematic Review of Resear…An Author's Guide to Publication Ethics: A Review of Emerging Standards in Biomedical Journals (2009)An Author's Guide to Publicat…Do medical journals provide clear and consistent guidelines on authorship? (2007)Do medical journals provide c…The Content of Medical Journal Instructions for Authors (2006)The Content of Medical Journa…The importance of interpersonal relationship factors in decisions regarding authorship. (2002)The importance of interperson…Evaluation of the Research Norms of Scientists and Administrators Responsible for Academic Research Integrity (1998)Evaluation of the Research No…Effects of training in the responsible conduct of research: A survey of graduate students in experimental sciences (1998)Effects of training in the re…Ethical issues in biomedical research: Perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellows responding to a survey (1996)Ethical issues in biomedical …A pilot study of biomedical traineesʼ perceptions concerning research ethics (1992)A pilot study of biomedical t…Gift authorship: Look the gift horse in the mouth (2022)Gift authorship: Look the gif…Guidelines for Editing Biomedical Journals: Recommended by Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina (2020)Guidelines for Editing Biomed…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review (2001)Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)A Decade of Empirical Research on Research Integrity: What Have We (Not) Looked At? (2019)What Research Institutions Can Do to Foster Research Integrity (2020)Effective Strategies for Research Integrity Training—a Meta-analysis (2021)The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty (1997)Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact medical journals: survey of instructions for authors (2005)Authorship problems in scholarly journals: considerations for authors, peer reviewers and editors (2012)Prescribed practices of authorship: review of codes of ethics from professional bodies and journal guidelines across disciplines (2012)Authorship policies of scientific journals: Table 1 (2015)Author Sequence and Credit for Contributions in Multiauthored Publications (2007)Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey (2011)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)Hijacked journals, hijacked web-sites, journal phishing, misleading metrics, and predatory publishing: actual and potential threats to academic integrity and publishing ethics (2016)Misconduct and Misbehavior Related to Authorship Disagreements in Collaborative Science (2019)And the credit goes to … - Ghost and honorary authorship among social scientists (2022)When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable (1997)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)How to do a meta‐analysis (2010)The rise in co-authorship in the social sciences (1980–2013) (2016)Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals (2018)Qualitative Research Methods (2021)Ethical Problems in Academic Research (1993)The Contributions of Authors to Multiauthored Biomedical Research Papers (1994)Authorship: time for a paradigm shift? (1997)Effectiveness of a responsible conduct of research course: a preliminary study (2007)Perspective (2012)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review (2017)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)A systematic review of titles and abstracts of experimental studies in medical education: many informative elements missing (2007)The EQUATOR Network and reporting guidelines: Helping to achieve high standards in reporting health research studies (2009)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Health Measurement Scales (2008)Feeling our way: academia, emotions and a politics of care (2016)Lessons From Pinocchio: Cues to Deception May Be Highly Exaggerated (2019)The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes (2023)A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (1957)Naturalistic inquiry (1985)The qualitative content analysis process (2008)Perceptions of research integrity climate differ between academic ranks and disciplinary fields: Results from a survey among academic researchers in Amsterdam (2019)Instrumentalism and the publish-or-perish regime (2022)Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys (2014)Scientific Misconduct (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011A Systematic Review of Research on the Meaning, Ethics and Practices of Authorship across Scholarly Disciplines394 cited
  • 2012Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers393 cited
  • 2014Publication Pressure and Scientific Misconduct in Medical Scientists221 cited
  • 2016Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication154 cited
  • 1992A pilot study of biomedical traineesʼ perceptions concerning research ethics137 cited
  • 1996Ethical issues in biomedical research: Perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellows responding to a survey122 cited
  • 2015Multiple Authorship in Scientific Manuscripts: Ethical Challenges, Ghost and Guest/Gift Authorship, and the Cultural/Disciplinary Perspective117 cited
  • 2007Do medical journals provide clear and consistent guidelines on authorship?100 cited
  • 2016How do scientists perceive the current publication culture? A qualitative focus group interview study among Dutch biomedical researchers91 cited
  • 2006The Content of Medical Journal Instructions for Authors73 cited
  • 1998Effects of training in the responsible conduct of research: A survey of graduate students in experimental sciences68 cited
  • 2009An Author's Guide to Publication Ethics: A Review of Emerging Standards in Biomedical Journals62 cited
  • 1998Evaluation of the Research Norms of Scientists and Administrators Responsible for Academic Research Integrity

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

57 cited
  • 2015China's medical research integrity questioned45 cited
  • 2002The importance of interpersonal relationship factors in decisions regarding authorship.39 cited
  • 2011Medical journal editors lacked familiarity with scientific publication issues despite training and regular exposure38 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2022Gift authorship: Look the gift horse in the mouth14 cited
    • 2020Guidelines for Editing Biomedical Journals: Recommended by Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina11 cited