SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reviews Pooling Heterogeneous, Low‐Evidence, High‐Bias Data Result in Incorrect Conclusions: But Heterogeneity is an Opportunity to Explore
1 references·2 citing·10 second hop
Reviews Pooling Heterogeneous, Low‐Evidence, High‐Bias Data Result in Incorrect Conclusions: But Heterogeneity is an Opportunity to Explore (2018)Reviews Pooling Heterogeneous, Low‐Eviden…The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…Reporting Bias in the Form of Positive Spin Is Highly Prevalent in Abstracts of Systematic Reviews on Primary Repair of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament (2024)Reporting Bias in the Form of…Tools to Improve Scientific Research (2018)Tools to Improve Scientific R…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)Research Pearls: The Significance of Statistics and Perils of Pooling. Part 3: Pearls and Pitfalls of Meta‐analyses and Systematic Reviews (2017)Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)The Systematic Review (2014)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,481 cited

Cited by

  • 2018Tools to Improve Scientific Research15 cited
  • 2024Reporting Bias in the Form of Positive Spin Is Highly Prevalent in Abstracts of Systematic Reviews on Primary Repair of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament13 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work