SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
An analysis of reporting quality of prospective studies examining community antibiotic use and resistance
8 references·0 citing·32 second hop
An analysis of reporting quality of prospective studies examining community antibiotic use and resistance (2018)An analysis of reporting quality of prosp…STROBE-AMS: recommendations to optimise reporting of epidemiological studies on antimicrobial resistance and informing improvement in antimicrobial stewardship (2016)STROBE-AMS: recommendations t…Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Better reporting of intervent…Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Guidance for Developers of He…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document (2017)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (2010)The STROBE extensions: protocol for a qualitative assessment of content and a survey of endorsement (2017)A cross-sectional bibliometric study showed suboptimal journal endorsement rates of STROBE and its extensions (2018)Adherence to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Statement in Observational Studies Published in Iranian Medical Journals (2020)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)Prevalence of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies22,003 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,387 cited
  • 2014Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide10,563 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials9,502 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials4,099 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 2010Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines1,432 cited
  • 2016STROBE-AMS: recommendations to optimise reporting of epidemiological studies on antimicrobial resistance and informing improvement in antimicrobial stewardship80 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work