SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
To Read More Papers, or to Read Papers Better? A Crucial Point for the Reproducibility Crisis
7 references·0 citing·30 second hop
To Read More Papers, or to Read Papers Better? A Crucial Point for the Reproducibility Crisis (2018)To Read More Papers, or to Read Papers Be…Reproducibility crisis in science or unrealistic expectations? (2018)Reproducibility crisis in sci…‘Spin’ in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic review (2017)‘Spin’ in published biomedica…The fickle P value generates irreproducible results (2015)The fickle P value generates …Overflow in science and its implications for trust (2015)Overflow in science and its i…Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)Introduction to Meta‐AnalysisWhy Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Commentary: Scientific heads are not turned by rhetoric (1995)Commentary: Scientific heads …A Proposal for Structured Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1994)Quality of nonstructured and structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association. (1994)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Nonrandomized quality improvement intervention trials might overstate the strength of causal inference of their findings (2009)Strength of verbs in medical writing should correspond to the level of evidence (or degree of causality): A plea for accuracy (2017)The earth is round (p < .05). (1994)Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists (2007)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)The earth is flat ( p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research (2017)Understanding and interpreting confidence and credible intervals around effect estimates (2018)Inferential Statistics as Descriptive Statistics: There Is No Replication Crisis if We Don’t Expect Replication (2019)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The Possibility of Systematic Research Fraud Targeting Under-Studied Human Genes: Causes, Consequences, and Potential Solutions (2019)Fifteen Years of Research on Customer Loyalty Formation: A Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Model (2024)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers (2018)Evidence of questionable research practices in clinical prediction models (2023)CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis (2010)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Introduction to Meta‐Analysis14,215 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 2015The fickle P value generates irreproducible results766 cited
  • 2017‘Spin’ in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic review314 cited
  • 2015Overflow in science and its implications for trust34 cited
  • 2018Reproducibility crisis in science or unrealistic expectations?31 cited
  • 1995Commentary: Scientific heads are not turned by rhetoric20 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work