SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Nonpublication Rates and Characteristics of Registered Randomized Clinical Trials in Digital Health: Cross-Sectional Analysis
16 references·4 citing·49 second hop
Nonpublication Rates and Characteristics of Registered Randomized Clinical Trials in Digital Health: Cross-Sectional Analysis (2018)Nonpublication Rates and Characteristics …Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)Systematic Review of the Empi…Persuasive System Design Does Matter: a Systematic Review of Adherence to Web-based Interventions (2012)Persuasive System Design Does…Which Intervention Characteristics are Related to More Exposure to Internet-Delivered Healthy Lifestyle Promotion Interventions? A Systematic Review (2011)Which Intervention Characteri…CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2011)CONSORT 2010 explanation and …A Systematic Review of the Impact of Adherence on the Effectiveness of e-Therapies (2011)A Systematic Review of the Im…Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Dissemination and publication…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Systematic Review of the Empi…Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Empirical Evidence for Select…Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2004)Clinical trial registration: …Registering Clinical Trials (2003)Registering Clinical TrialsPublication Decisions Revisited: The Effect of the Outcome of Statistical Tests on the Decision to Publish and Vice Versa (1995)Publication Decisions Revisit…Underreporting Research Is Scientific Misconduct (1990)Underreporting Research Is Sc…The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)The Existence of Publication …Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. (1986)Publication bias: the case fo…The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)The file drawer problem and t…Time to publication for results of clinical trials (2024)Time to publication for resul…Predicting Publication of Clinical Trials Using Structured and Unstructured Data: Model Development and Validation Study (2022)Predicting Publication of Cli…Gray Literature in Evaluating Effectiveness in Digital Health and Health and Welfare Technology: A Source Worth Considering (2021)Gray Literature in Evaluating…Characteristics of Neuropsychiatric Mobile Health Trials: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Studies Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (2020)Characteristics of Neuropsych…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts (2013)In meta-analyses of proportion studies, funnel plots were found to be an inaccurate method of assessing publication bias (2014)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)Artifact in behavioral research (1969)The Handbook of Social Psychology (1969)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. (2007)A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. (2008)Using the Internet to Promote Health Behavior Change: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Impact of Theoretical Basis, Use of Behavior Change Techniques, and Mode of Delivery on Efficacy (2010)Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions: a systematic review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis (2016)Effectiveness of online mindfulness-based interventions in improving mental health: A review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (2016)Understanding and Promoting Effective Engagement With Digital Behavior Change Interventions (2016)A Comprehensive Review and a Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Internet-Based Psychotherapeutic Interventions (2008)Adherence in Internet Interventions for Anxiety and Depression (2009)Internet-Based and Other Computerized Psychological Treatments for Adult Depression: A Meta-Analysis (2009)Behavioral Intervention Technologies: Evidence review and recommendations for future research in mental health (2013)The impact of guidance on Internet-based mental health interventions — A systematic review (2014)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies. (2012)A CHecklist for statistical Assessment of Medical Papers (the CHAMP statement): explanation and elaboration (2021)Guidelines for Reporting Trial Protocols and Completed Trials Modified Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Extenuating Circumstances (2021)Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequences (2000)A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta‐analysis (2001)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning (2017)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1979The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.9,043 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
  • 2011CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials2,342 cited
  • 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
  • 2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
  • 1990The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence1,413 cited
  • 2012Persuasive System Design Does Matter: a Systematic Review of Adherence to Web-based Interventions1,307 cited
  • 2013Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review1,126 cited
  • 2010Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases1,039 cited
  • 2011A Systematic Review of the Impact of Adherence on the Effectiveness of e-Therapies876 cited
  • 1986Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials.746 cited
  • 1990Underreporting Research Is Scientific Misconduct552 cited
  • 2003Registering Clinical Trials511 cited
  • 2011Which Intervention Characteristics are Related to More Exposure to Internet-Delivered Healthy Lifestyle Promotion Interventions? A Systematic Review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

455 cited
  • 1995Publication Decisions Revisited: The Effect of the Outcome of Statistical Tests on the Decision to Publish and Vice Versa453 cited
  • 2004Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors408 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024Time to publication for results of clinical trials31 cited
    • 2021Gray Literature in Evaluating Effectiveness in Digital Health and Health and Welfare Technology: A Source Worth Considering29 cited
    • 2022Predicting Publication of Clinical Trials Using Structured and Unstructured Data: Model Development and Validation Study15 cited
    • 2020Characteristics of Neuropsychiatric Mobile Health Trials: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Studies Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov5 cited