Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Replication, Duplication, and Waste in a Quarter Million Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

3 references·16 citing·44 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,481 cited
2014Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview1,308 cited
2013Overlapping meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies248 cited

Cited by

2019Vibration of effects from diverse inclusion/exclusion criteria and analytical choices: 9216 different ways to perform an indirect comparison meta-analysis61 cited
2021Harms in Systematic Reviews Paper 3: Given the same data sources, systematic reviews of gabapentin have different results for harms31 cited
2021A new taxonomy was developed for overlap across 'overviews of systematic reviews': A meta‐research study of research waste29 cited
2019Evaluation of Systematic Reviews of Interventions for Retina and Vitreous Conditions28 cited
2025Rapid reviews methods series: guidance on rapid scoping, mapping and evidence and gap map (‘Big Picture Reviews’)23 cited
2021More consideration is needed for retracted non-Cochrane systematic reviews in medicine: a systematic review20 cited
2020How to decide whether a systematic review is stable and not in need of updating: Analysis of Cochrane reviews18 cited
2020Nutrition in times of Covid-19, how to trust the deluge of scientific information16 cited
2022Extent and nature of duplication in PROSPERO using COVID-19-related registrations: a retrospective investigation and survey16 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2020Redundant meta-analyses are common in genetic epidemiology14 cited

2022When is the evidence conclusive? Analysis of systematic reviews for which Cochrane declared that conclusions will not change with further studies13 cited

2023The need for robust critique of arts and health research: Dance‐movement therapy, girls, and depression13 cited

2021Ensuring rigor in systematic reviews: Part 6, reporting guidelines11 cited

2023A Cross-Sectional Study Based on Forty Systematic Reviews of Foods with Function Claims (FFC) in Japan: Quality Assessment Using AMSTAR 29 cited

2022Scoping reviews in orthodontics: are they justified?9 cited

2024An international modified Delphi process supported updating the web-based "right review" tool9 cited