Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

When and Why to Replicate: As Easy as 1, 2, 3?

16 references·12 citing·35 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
1979The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.9,043 cited
2015Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science8,516 cited
2013Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience7,634 cited
2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,702 cited
2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials2,754 cited
2015Promoting an open research culture2,686 cited
2012Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling2,240 cited
1998HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known1,988 cited
2018Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 20151,519 cited
2014Reproducibility in Science1,031 cited
2018Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings944 cited
2012Replications in Psychology Research750 cited
2012Learning, Attentional Control, and Action Video Games683 cited
2017Making replication mainstream478 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2014The Fresh Start Effect: Temporal Landmarks Motivate Aspirational Behavior334 cited

Cited by

2023The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes137 cited
2022Proposal of a Selection Protocol for Replication of Studies in Sports and Exercise Science36 cited
2023The process of replication target selection in psychology: what to consider?26 cited
2020Do Religious Primes Increase Risk Taking? Evidence Against “Anticipating Divine Protection” in Two Preregistered Direct Replications of Kupor, Laurin, and Levav (2015)21 cited
2025Replication value as a function of citation impact and sample size18 cited
2023Perspectives on scientific error16 cited
2024Examining the replicability of online experiments selected by a decision market16 cited
2021Replication target selection in clinical psychology: A Bayesian and qualitative reevaluation.15 cited
2025How can we make sound replication decisions?11 cited
2024The Importance of Replication9 cited
2021Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science)9 cited
2025International initiatives to enhance awareness and uptake of open research in psychology: a systematic mapping review8 cited