SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Inclusion and exclusion criteria and the problem of describing homogeneity of study populations in clinical trials
1 references·1 citing·9 second hop
Inclusion and exclusion criteria and the problem of describing homogeneity of study populations in clinical trials (2018)Inclusion and exclusion criteria and the …The Proposal to Lower P Value Thresholds to .005 (2018)The Proposal to Lower P Value…Efficacy and effectiveness studies of depression are not well-differentiated in the literature: a systematic review (2020)Efficacy and effectiveness st…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Redefine statistical significance (2017)Reproducible research practices, transparency, and open access data in the biomedical literature, 2015–2017 (2018)Psychology's Replication Crisis and Clinical Psychological Science (2019)On climate anxiety and the threat it may pose to daily life functioning and adaptation: a study among European and African French-speaking participants (2022)An Inventory for Measuring Depression (1961)The PHQ-9 (2001)A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder (2006)Transparency of results reporting for depression treatment studies in ClinicalTrials.gov: a cross-sectional study (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2018The Proposal to Lower P Value Thresholds to .005654 cited

Cited by

  • 2020Efficacy and effectiveness studies of depression are not well-differentiated in the literature: a systematic review10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work