Assessment of Publication Bias and Systematic Review Findings in Top-Ranked Otolaryngology Journals

Andrew Ross · Craig M. Cooper · Harrison M. Gray · Blake A. Umberham · Matt B. Vassar

14 citations0/0 files storedJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews scientometrics and bibliometrics research Academic Publishing and Open Access

Abstract

This study analyzes whether 324 systematic reviews that contain at least 1 meta-analysis with 10 or more primary studies published in top otolaryngology journals that do not evaluate for publication bias show evidence of such bias.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 14 citations exist upstream.

References

1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test 1994Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias 2000Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis 1988Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical Data 1987Accumulating evidence from independent studies: What we can win and what we can lose

Cited by

2023Positive Outcome Bias in the Influential Otolaryngology Clinical Trial Literature

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.