SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evaluation of spin within abstracts in obesity randomized clinical trials: A cross‐sectional review
7 references·16 citing·51 second hopsampled
Evaluation of spin within abstracts in obesity randomized clinical trials: A cross‐sectional review (2018)Evaluation of spin within abstracts in ob…‘Spin’ in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic review (2017)‘Spin’ in published biomedica…Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Rayyan—a web and mobile app f…Peer reviewers identified spin in manuscripts of nonrandomized studies assessing therapeutic interventions, but their impact on spin in abstract conclusions was limited (2016)Peer reviewers identified spi…Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial (2014)Impact of Spin in the Abstrac…Remarkable Growth of Open Access in the Biomedical Field: Analysis of PubMed Articles from 2006 to 2010 (2013)Remarkable Growth of Open Acc…Misrepresentation of Randomized Controlled Trials in Press Releases and News Coverage: A Cohort Study (2012)Misrepresentation of Randomiz…Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)Reporting and Interpretation …Transparent and Reproducible Research Practices in the Surgical Literature (2022)Transparent and Reproducible …Spin in the Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials in Operative Dentistry: A Cross-sectional Analysis (2022)Spin in the Abstracts of Rand…Spin in the Abstracts of Meta-analyses and Systematic Reviews: Midshaft Clavicle Fracture (2022)Spin in the Abstracts of Meta…Reporting Bias in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Related to the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures: The Presence of Spin in the Abstract (2022)Reporting Bias in Systematic …The presence and characteristics of ‘spin’ among randomized controlled trial abstracts in orthodontics (2021)The presence and characterist…Reporting, interpretation, and extrapolation issues (SPIN) in abstracts of orthodontic meta-analyses published from 2000 to 2020 (2021)Reporting, interpretation, an…Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses related to the treatment of proximal humeral fractures (2021)Evaluation of spin in the abs…Evaluation of Spin in the Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Covering Treatments for Achilles Tendon Ruptures (2021)Evaluation of Spin in the Abs…Evaluation of “Spin” in the Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Focused on Cataract Therapies (2021)Evaluation of “Spin” in the A…Do not make clinical decisions based on abstracts of healthcare research: A systematic review (2021)Do not make clinical decision…Spin in the abstracts of randomized controlled trials in periodontology and oral implantology: A cross‐sectional analysis (2020)Spin in the abstracts of rand…Reporting quality and spin in abstracts of randomized clinical trials of periodontal therapy and cardiovascular disease outcomes (2020)Reporting quality and spin in…Evaluation of Spin in the Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Focused on the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris: Cross-Sectional Analysis (2020)Evaluation of Spin in the Abs…Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses covering surgical management, or quality of life after surgical management, of osteoarthritis of the knee (2020)Evaluation of spin in the abs…Abstracts of published randomized controlled trials in Endodontics: reporting quality and spin (2020)Abstracts of published random…Using the CONSORT statement to evaluate the completeness of reporting of addiction randomised trials: a cross-sectional review (2019)Using the CONSORT statement t…Mass media interventions: effects on health services utilisation (2002)CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)A new classification of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses was developed and ranked according to the severity (2016)Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature (2018)Misinformation in and about science (2021)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Does Cultural Competency Training of Health Professionals Improve Patient Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Proposed Algorithm for Future Research (2010)Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)Evolution of Reporting P Values in the Biomedical Literature, 1990-2015 (2016)Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (2008)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: retrospective analysis (2015)Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009 (2010)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure (2012)Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts (2015)Open access to journal articles in dentistry: Prevalence and citation impact (2016)Predatory Publishing Is a Threat to Non-Mainstream Science (2017)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration (2014)Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of otolaryngology randomized controlled trials (2018)Hype in reports of clinical research: The authors' perspectives (2020)Trends in the Use of Promotional Language (Hype) in Abstracts of Successful National Institutes of Health Grant Applications, 1985-2020 (2022)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review (2019)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers (2018)Evidence of questionable research practices in clinical prediction models (2023)CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Extent and prevalence of spin in randomized controlled trials in dentistry (2020)Abstracts for reports of randomized trials of COVID-19 interventions had low quality and high spin (2021)A review of high impact journals found that misinterpretation of non-statistically significant results from randomized trials was common (2022)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Evaluation of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of superior capsular reconstruction (2022)Assessment of Spin in the Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses on Platelet-Rich Plasma Treatment in Orthopaedics: A Cross-sectional Analysis (2023)Spin in the Abstracts of Meta-analyses and Systematic Reviews: Quadriceps Tendon Graft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (2023)Analysis of 567,758 randomized controlled trials published over 30 years reveals trends in phrases used to discuss results that do not reach statistical significance (2022)Assessment of Spin in the Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials in Dental Caries with Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes: A Methodological Study (2023)CONSORT statement adherence and risk of bias in randomized controlled trials on deep caries management: a meta-research (2024)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2016Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews25,980 cited
  • 2010Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes828 cited
  • 2014Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial366 cited
  • 2017‘Spin’ in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic review314 cited
  • 2012Misrepresentation of Randomized Controlled Trials in Press Releases and News Coverage: A Cohort Study293 cited
  • 2013Remarkable Growth of Open Access in the Biomedical Field: Analysis of PubMed Articles from 2006 to 201066 cited
  • 2016Peer reviewers identified spin in manuscripts of nonrandomized studies assessing therapeutic interventions, but their impact on spin in abstract conclusions was limited58 cited

Cited by

  • 2021The presence and characteristics of ‘spin’ among randomized controlled trial abstracts in orthodontics45 cited
  • 2020Reporting quality and spin in abstracts of randomized clinical trials of periodontal therapy and cardiovascular disease outcomes38 cited
  • 2021Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses related to the treatment of proximal humeral fractures34 cited
  • 2020Abstracts of published randomized controlled trials in Endodontics: reporting quality and spin33 cited
  • 2020Spin in the abstracts of randomized controlled trials in periodontology and oral implantology: A cross‐sectional analysis

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

28 cited
  • 2021Reporting, interpretation, and extrapolation issues (SPIN) in abstracts of orthodontic meta-analyses published from 2000 to 202026 cited
  • 2020Evaluation of Spin in the Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Focused on the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris: Cross-Sectional Analysis25 cited
  • 2019Using the CONSORT statement to evaluate the completeness of reporting of addiction randomised trials: a cross-sectional review25 cited
  • 2021Do not make clinical decisions based on abstracts of healthcare research: A systematic review24 cited
  • 2021Evaluation of Spin in the Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Covering Treatments for Achilles Tendon Ruptures23 cited
  • 2022Spin in the Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials in Operative Dentistry: A Cross-sectional Analysis14 cited
  • 2020Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses covering surgical management, or quality of life after surgical management, of osteoarthritis of the knee13 cited
  • 2022Reporting Bias in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Related to the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures: The Presence of Spin in the Abstract12 cited
  • 2022Spin in the Abstracts of Meta-analyses and Systematic Reviews: Midshaft Clavicle Fracture12 cited
  • 2021Evaluation of “Spin” in the Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Focused on Cataract Therapies12 cited
  • 2022Transparent and Reproducible Research Practices in the Surgical Literature8 cited