A Review of Carbon Capture and Storage Project Investment and Operational Decision-Making Based on Bibliometrics

Yunbing Hou · Pengtao Wang · Bo Yang

65 citations0/0 files storedEnergies

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Capital Investment and Risk Analysis Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions

Abstract

The research on carbon capture and storage (CCS) project planning and investment and operational decision-making can provide a reference for enterprises to invest in CCS and for policy-makers to formulate policies to promote CCS development. So what are the current research hotspots in this field and the gaps that still need to be further studied in the future? This paper reviews the research in the field by a bibliometric analysis. The results show that the research in this field first focus on cost analysis, followed by project investment evaluation, project planning (cost curve and pipeline network), and project operation. In particular, fossil fuel power plants, pipeline transportation, and oil fields are the most crucial objects in the three technical links of CCS projects, respectively. Policies, carbon pricing, and uncertainty in cost and benefits are factors that are mainly discussed in this field. The methods used for CCS project planning are cost curve model and optimization model. The real option approach is suitable for the evaluation of investment decision-making. The evaluation of operational decision is mostly based on optimization model. The future research directions can be summarized as five points: (1) continuously and systematically update the calculated costs in the current research to the unified price of the latest year; (2) calculate the cost curve from the perspective of emission sources; (3) expand the planning region of pipeline network to the country, continent, and even the entire world; (4) pay more attention to the investment assessment of the CCS project that may be implemented with low cost and high return; and (5) analyze the optimal operation mode of CCS in the low-load power system.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 65 citations exist upstream.

References

2015Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change 2015Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions 2000Warming the World 1998Strategic Growth Options 2001Project Management Under Risk: Using the Real Options Approach to Evaluate Flexibility in R…D 2011Trends in research on global climate change: A Science Citation Index Expanded-based analysis 2010Uncertainty modeling of CCS investment strategy in China’s power sector 2013A novel modeling based real option approach for CCS investment evaluation under multiple uncertainties

Cited by

2019A novel analysis of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology adoption: An evolutionary game model between stakeholders 2024Study on the diffusion of CCUS technology under carbon trading mechanism: Based on the perspective of tripartite evolutionary game among thermal power enterprises, government and public 2019CCS Projects: How Regulatory Framework Influences Their Deployment 2022Investment in CO2 capture and storage combined with enhanced oil recovery in China: A case study of China's first megaton-scale project

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.