SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Open Access Medical Journals: Promise, Perils, and Pitfalls
14 references·0 citing·35 second hop
Open Access Medical Journals: Promise, Perils, and Pitfalls (2019)Open Access Medical Journals: Promise, Pe…Predatory journals recruit fake editor (2017)Predatory journals recruit fa…Mystery as controversial list of predatory publishers disappears (2017)Mystery as controversial list…Identifying predatory or pseudo-journals (2017)Identifying predatory or pseu…Identifying Predatory or Pseudo-Journals (2017)Identifying Predatory or Pseu…Controversial website that lists ‘predatory’ publishers shuts down (2017)Controversial website that li…Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals (2016)Peer Review Quality and Trans…Essential Information about Predatory Publishers and Journals (2016)Essential Information about P…Beyond Beall’s List: Better understanding predatory publishers (2015)Beyond Beall’s List: Better u…A Growing Threat for Academicians: Fake and Predatory Journals (2015)A Growing Threat for Academic…‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)‘Predatory’ open access: a lo…Addressing Faculty Publishing Concerns with Open Access Journal Quality Indicators (2014)Addressing Faculty Publishing…Effect of the Statistical Significance of Results on the Time to Completion and Publication of Randomized Efficacy Trials (1998)Effect of the Statistical Sig…Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Factors Influencing Publicati…Underreporting Research Is Scientific Misconduct (1990)Underreporting Research Is Sc…Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical Data (1988)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement (1996)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results (2009)Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction (1992)Registering Clinical Trials (2003)Bias in Clinical Intervention Research (2006)Efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions in anxiety and depression: Meta-analysis (2015)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why? (2018)Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis (2019)Exploring PubMed as a reliable resource for scholarly communications services (2019)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)The foreign gaze: authorship in academic global health (2019)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups (2006)Negative Effects of “Predatory” Journals on Global Health Research (2018)Academia's responses to crisis: A bibliometric analysis of literature on online learning in higher education during COVID‐19 (2022)The false academy: predatory publishing in science and bioethics (2016)Problems and challenges of predatory journals (2018)Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) (2021)The present and future of peer review: Ideas, interventions, and evidence (2025)Where Arab social science and humanities scholars choose to publish: Falling in the predatory journals trap (2018)Plagiarism in Predatory Publications: A Comparative Study of Three Nursing Journals (2019)Beall's legacy in the battle against predatory publishers (2021)Awareness of predatory journals and open access among medical oncologists: results of an online survey (2019)Predatory journals: Authors and readers beware. (2019)A walk on the wild side: ‘Predatory’ journals and information asymmetries in scientific evaluations (2018)How predatory journals leak into PubMed (2018)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)Formulating Questions and Locating Primary Studies for Inclusion in Systematic Reviews (1997)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1992Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results853 cited
  • 2015‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics818 cited
  • 1998Effect of the Statistical Significance of Results on the Time to Completion and Publication of Randomized Efficacy Trials631 cited
  • 1990Underreporting Research Is Scientific Misconduct552 cited
  • 2017Predatory journals recruit fake editor238 cited
  • 2016Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals166 cited
  • 2015Beyond Beall’s List: Better understanding predatory publishers163 cited
  • 2017Identifying predatory or pseudo-journals146 cited
  • 2016Essential Information about Predatory Publishers and Journals77 cited
  • 2017Controversial website that lists ‘predatory’ publishers shuts down57 cited
  • 2014Addressing Faculty Publishing Concerns with Open Access Journal Quality Indicators45 cited
  • 2015A Growing Threat for Academicians: Fake and Predatory Journals35 cited
  • 2017Identifying Predatory or Pseudo-Journals33 cited
  • 2017Mystery as controversial list of predatory publishers disappears20 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work