Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Group Decision Making with Heterogeneous Preference Structures: An Automatic Mechanism to Support Consensus Reaching

16 references·16 citing·27 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1985The Analytic Hierarchy Process15,357 cited
1977A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures10,389 cited
1951Social Choice and Individual Values.7,792 cited
2013Analytic Hierarchy Process5,580 cited
1952Social Choice and Individual Values4,699 cited
1972Collective Choice and Social Welfare2,565 cited
1978Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation1,243 cited
2017Collective Choice and Social Welfare1,150 cited
1998Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations772 cited
2002A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures764 cited
2013A review of soft consensus models in a fuzzy environment712 cited
2005A Consensus Support System Model for Group Decision-Making Problems With Multigranular Linguistic Preference Relations639 cited
2004Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making618 cited
2018Consensus reaching in social network group decision making: Research paradigms and challenges570 cited
2001Integrating multiplicative preference relations in a multipurpose decision-making model based on fuzzy preference relations

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

524 cited

2015Consensus model for multi-criteria large-group emergency decision making considering non-cooperative behaviors and minority opinions467 cited

Cited by

2020Impact of Decision Rules and Non-cooperative Behaviors on Minimum Consensus Cost in Group Decision Making131 cited
2019A two-stage dynamic influence model-achieving decision-making consensus within large scale groups operating with incomplete information113 cited
2019RANKING RANGE BASED APPROACH TO MADM UNDER INCOMPLETE CONTEXT AND ITS APPLICATION IN VENTURE INVESTMENT EVALUATION112 cited
2021A limited cost consensus approach with fairness concern and its application107 cited
2020A Personalized Consensus Feedback Mechanism Based on Maximum Harmony Degree98 cited
2019Modeling Personalized Individual Semantics and Consensus in Comparative Linguistic Expression Preference Relations With Self-Confidence: An Optimization-Based Approach96 cited
2019Linguistic Distribution-Based Optimization Approach for Large-Scale GDM With Comparative Linguistic Information: An Application on the Selection of Wastewater Disinfection Technology88 cited
2021Democratic consensus reaching process for multi-person multi-criteria large scale decision making considering participants’ individual attributes and concerns87 cited
2021Consensus Reaching in Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making: A Multi-Stage Optimization Feedback Mechanism With Individual Bounded Confidences84 cited
2021Exploring the Ordinal Classifications of Failure Modes in the Reliability Management: An Optimization-Based Consensus Model with Bounded Confidences80 cited
2019Integrating a consensus-reaching mechanism with bounded confidences into failure mode and effect analysis under incomplete context72 cited
2020A minimum adjustment consensus framework with compromise limits for social network group decision making under incomplete information72 cited
2022Classical dynamic consensus and opinion dynamics models: A survey of recent trends and methodologies72 cited
2021An optimisation-based method to conduct consistency and consensus in group decision making under probabilistic uncertain linguistic preference relations71 cited
2021How to determine the consensus threshold in group decision making: a method based on efficiency benchmark using benefit and cost insight70 cited
2022A maximum fairness consensus model with limited cost in group decision making68 cited