SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A head-to-head comparison of five-level (EQ-5D-5L-Y) and three-level EQ-5D-Y questionnaires in paediatric patients
16 references·4 citing·36 second hop
A head-to-head comparison of five-level (EQ-5D-5L-Y) and three-level EQ-5D-Y questionnaires in paediatric patients (2019)A head-to-head comparison of five-level (…Is EQ-5D-5L Better Than EQ-5D-3L? A Head-to-Head Comparison of Descriptive Systems and Value Sets from Seven Countries (2018)Is EQ-5D-5L Better Than EQ-5D…Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to EQ-5D-3L in the Thai diabetes patients (2015)Measurement properties of the…A Review of the Development and Application of Generic Multi-Attribute Utility Instruments for Paediatric Populations (2015)A Review of the Development a…From Translation to Version Management: A History and Review of Methods for the Cultural Adaptation of the EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire (2014)From Translation to Version M…A comparison of Cohen’s Kappa and Gwet’s AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples (2013)A comparison of Cohen’s Kappa…Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study (2012)Measurement properties of the…Interim Scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: Mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L Value Sets (2012)Interim Scoring for the EQ-5D…Comparing the performance of the standard EQ-5D 3L with the new version EQ-5D 5L in patients with chronic hepatic diseases (2012)Comparing the performance of …Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist (2011)Rating the methodological qua…Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) (2011)Development and preliminary t…Comparing the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in cancer patients in Korea (2011)Comparing the psychometric pr…Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the EQ-5D-Y: results from a multinational study (2010)Feasibility, reliability, and…Development of the EQ-5D-Y: a child-friendly version of the EQ-5D (2010)Development of the EQ-5D-Y: a…Comparing the Standard EQ-5D Three-Level System with a Five-Level Version (2007)Comparing the Standard EQ-5D …Computing inter‐rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement (2006)Computing inter‐rater reliabi…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…Valuing EQ-5D-Y: the current state of play (2022)Valuing EQ-5D-Y: the current …Measurement Properties of the EQ-5D-Y: A Systematic Review (2022)Measurement Properties of the…Comparing measurement properties of EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L in paediatric patients (2021)Comparing measurement propert…Responsiveness of EQ-5D Youth version 5-level (EQ-5D-5L-Y) and 3-level (EQ-5D-3L-Y) in Patients With Idiopathic Scoliosis (2019)Responsiveness of EQ-5D Youth…The New Zealand Medical Journal 1887-1987. (1987)EuroQol: the current state of play (1996)EQ-SD: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group (2001)Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England (2017)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. (1971)Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed (2010)Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed (2011)Modeling Valuations for EuroQol Health States (1997)EQ-5D and the EuroQol Group: Past, Present and Future (2017)The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A Research Note (1997)Valuation of the Child Health Utility 9D Index (2012)Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires (2006)The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010)Measurement in Medicine (2011)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (2017)COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (2018)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life (1990)EQ-5D-5L norms for the urban Chinese population in China (2018)Validity of the EQ–5D–5L and reference norms for the Spanish population (2018)Methods for Analysing and Reporting EQ-5D Data (2020)International Journal of Behavioral Medicine (2013)Quality assessment of observational studies in a drug-safety systematic review, comparison of two tools: the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and the RTI item bank (2014)Social networks, social capital, social support and academic success in higher education: A systematic review with a special focus on ‘underrepresented’ students (2019)Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Research to Support Medical Product Labeling: Report of the ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices for the Assessment of Children and Adolescents Task Force (2013)The European KIDSCREEN approach to measure quality of life and well-being in children: development, current application, and future advances (2013)Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Alongside Clinical Trials II—An ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force Report (2015)Dutch Tariff for the Five-Level Version of EQ-5D (2016)Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,603 cited
  • 2011Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)10,051 cited
  • 2006Computing inter‐rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement2,210 cited
  • 2012Interim Scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: Mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L Value Sets2,177 cited
  • 2011Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist1,977 cited
  • 2012Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study1,616 cited
  • 2013A comparison of Cohen’s Kappa and Gwet’s AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples1,041 cited
  • 2010Development of the EQ-5D-Y: a child-friendly version of the EQ-5D871 cited
  • 2010Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the EQ-5D-Y: results from a multinational study465 cited
  • 2018Is EQ-5D-5L Better Than EQ-5D-3L? A Head-to-Head Comparison of Descriptive Systems and Value Sets from Seven Countries381 cited
  • 2007Comparing the Standard EQ-5D Three-Level System with a Five-Level Version275 cited
  • 2014From Translation to Version Management: A History and Review of Methods for the Cultural Adaptation of the EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire269 cited
  • 2011Comparing the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in cancer patients in Korea

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

161 cited
  • 2015A Review of the Development and Application of Generic Multi-Attribute Utility Instruments for Paediatric Populations136 cited
  • 2012Comparing the performance of the standard EQ-5D 3L with the new version EQ-5D 5L in patients with chronic hepatic diseases135 cited
  • 2015Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to EQ-5D-3L in the Thai diabetes patients135 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021Comparing measurement properties of EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L in paediatric patients55 cited
    • 2022Measurement Properties of the EQ-5D-Y: A Systematic Review55 cited
    • 2022Valuing EQ-5D-Y: the current state of play53 cited
    • 2019Responsiveness of EQ-5D Youth version 5-level (EQ-5D-5L-Y) and 3-level (EQ-5D-3L-Y) in Patients With Idiopathic Scoliosis51 cited