Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Rolling Out the Red (and Green) Carpet: Supporting Driver Decision Making in Automation-to-Manual Transitions

16 references·9 citing·37 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1988Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research15,045 cited
1986Relevance: Communication and Cognition6,707 cited
2000A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation4,175 cited
1985A Critical View of Driver Behavior Models: What Do We Know, What Should We Do?1,285 cited
1993Performance Consequences of Automation-Induced 'Complacency'873 cited
1997A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of advanced transport telematics867 cited
2013“Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop?775 cited
2014Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: A review of the empirical evidence740 cited
2005Joint Cognitive Systems: Foundations of Cognitive Systems Engineering732 cited
1999Does automation bias decision-making?704 cited
2005Joint Cognitive Systems694 cited
2017Takeover Time in Highly Automated Vehicles: Noncritical Transitions to and From Manual Control691 cited
2014Transition to manual: Driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle642 cited
1980Flight-deck automation: promises and problems599 cited
2015

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving

488 cited

2014How Traffic Situations and Non-Driving Related Tasks Affect the Take-Over Quality in Highly Automated Driving447 cited

Cited by

2022Does a faster takeover necessarily mean it is better? A study on the influence of urgency and takeover-request lead time on takeover performance and safety89 cited
2021Modeling takeover behavior in level 3 automated driving via a structural equation model: Considering the mediating role of trust81 cited
2018Carrot and stick: A game-theoretic approach to motivate cooperative driving through social interaction79 cited
2020Evaluating Effects of Cognitive Load, Takeover Request Lead Time, and Traffic Density on Drivers’ Takeover Performance in Conditionally Automated Driving78 cited
2019Getting Back Into the Loop: The Perceptual-Motor Determinants of Successful Transitions out of Automated Driving65 cited
2021Are novice drivers competent to take over control from level 3 automated vehicles? A comparative study with experienced drivers59 cited
2021The effects of age and physical exercise on multimodal signal responses: Implications for semi-autonomous vehicle takeover requests51 cited
2021Effects of User Interfaces on Take-Over Performance: A Review of the Empirical Evidence50 cited
2021Designing Alert Systems in Takeover Transitions: The Effects of Display Information and Modality49 cited