SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Do judges hate speculators?
16 references·0 citing·39 second hop
Do judges hate speculators? (2019)Do judges hate speculators?U.S. Supreme Court Opinions and their Audiences (2016)U.S. Supreme Court Opinions a…Justice Is Less Blind, and Less Legalistic, than We Thought: Evidence from an Experiment with Real Judges (2016)Justice Is Less Blind, and Le…The Behavior of Federal Judges: A Theoretical and Empirical Study of Rational Choice (2013)The Behavior of Federal Judge…Extraneous factors in judicial decisions (2011)Extraneous factors in judicia…Judicial Independence and Party Politics in the Kelsenian Constitutional Courts: The Case of Portugal (2009)Judicial Independence and Par…Judges and Their Audiences (2009)Judges and Their AudiencesAre judges political?: an empirical analysis of the federal judiciary (2007)Are judges political?: an emp…Mechanism of Motivated Reasoning? Analogical Perception in Discrimination Disputes (2006)Mechanism of Motivated Reason…Judges and their audiences: a perspective on judicial behavior (2006)Judges and their audiences: a…Playing Dice With Criminal Sentences: The Influence of Irrelevant Anchors on Experts’ Judicial Decision Making (2005)Playing Dice With Criminal Se…The emergence of coherence over the course of decision making. (2001)The emergence of coherence ov…Inside the Judicial Mind (2001)Inside the Judicial MindBidirectional reasoning in decision making by constraint satisfaction. (1999)Bidirectional reasoning in de…The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)The case for motivated reason…The Selection of Disputes for Litigation (1984)The Selection of Disputes for…Hypothesis-testing processes in social interaction. (1978)Hypothesis-testing processes …Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions (1987)The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? (2016)European Union Regulations on Algorithmic Decision Making and a “Right to Explanation” (2017)A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning (2021)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. (1994)Sight over sound in the judgment of music performance (2013)Opening the Black Box of “Not Invented Here”: Attitudes, Decision Biases, and Behavioral Consequences (2014)The Principles and Limits of Algorithm-in-the-Loop Decision Making (2019)Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. (1984)How do People Know? (2001)Beyond dual-process models: A categorisation of processes underlying intuitive judgement and decision making (2009)Toward a formalized account of attitudes: The Causal Attitude Network (CAN) model. (2015)A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (2017)Personality and Assessment (1968)Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability (1973)Features of similarity. (1977)Prototypes in Person Perception (1979)Beyond attribution theory: Cognitive processes in performance appraisal. (1981)Self-verification processes: How we sustain our self-conceptions (1981)The Handbook of Social Psychology (1969)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Well-being : the foundations of hedonic psychology (1999)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Economic growth and judicial independence, a dozen years on: Cross-country evidence using an updated Set of indicators (2015)How Party Polarization Affects Governance (2015)Using machine learning to predict decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (2019)The Legal Environments of Organizations (1997)Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a Natural Language Processing perspective (2016)On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models (2021)The Separation of Powers, Court Curbing, and Judicial Legitimacy (2009)Ideological Social Identity: Psychological Attachment to Ideological In-Groups as a Political Phenomenon and a Behavioral Influence (2014)Judicial Independence and Political Uncertainty: How the Risk of Override Affects the Court of Justice of the EU (2016)Decision Making, in Criminal Justice (2007)Decision Making Under the Gambler’s Fallacy: Evidence from Asylum Judges, Loan Officers, and Baseball Umpires * (2016)When Organizations Rule: Judicial Deference to Institutionalized Employment Structures (2011)Identifying Judicial Empathy: Does Having Daughters Cause Judges to Rule for Women's Issues? (2014)The Political Economy of the Investment Treaty Regime (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1990The case for motivated reasoning.9,014 cited
  • 2011Extraneous factors in judicial decisions1,431 cited
  • 1984The Selection of Disputes for Litigation1,283 cited
  • 1978Hypothesis-testing processes in social interaction.937 cited
  • 2005Playing Dice With Criminal Sentences: The Influence of Irrelevant Anchors on Experts’ Judicial Decision Making553 cited
  • 2007Are judges political?: an empirical analysis of the federal judiciary413 cited
  • 1999Bidirectional reasoning in decision making by constraint satisfaction.407 cited
  • 2013The Behavior of Federal Judges: A Theoretical and Empirical Study of Rational Choice403 cited
  • 2009Judges and Their Audiences361 cited
  • 2001Inside the Judicial Mind318 cited
  • 2006Judges and their audiences: a perspective on judicial behavior308 cited
  • 2001The emergence of coherence over the course of decision making.198 cited
  • 2006Mechanism of Motivated Reasoning? Analogical Perception in Discrimination Disputes161 cited
  • 2009Judicial Independence and Party Politics in the Kelsenian Constitutional Courts: The Case of Portugal106 cited
  • 2016U.S. Supreme Court Opinions and their Audiences99 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2016Justice Is Less Blind, and Less Legalistic, than We Thought: Evidence from an Experiment with Real Judges87 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.