SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Open access solutions for biodiversity journals: Do not replace one problem with another
5 references·6 citing·31 second hop
Open access solutions for biodiversity journals: Do not replace one problem with another (2019)Open access solutions for biodiversity jo…Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature (2018)Sci-Hub provides access to ne…Radical open-access plan could spell end to journal subscriptions (2018)Radical open-access plan coul…Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)Open access: The true cost of…A study of open access journals using article processing charges (2012)A study of open access journa…Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal (2011)Publication fees in open acce…Does it pay to pay? A comparison of the benefits of open-access publishing across various sub-fields in biology (2024)Does it pay to pay? A compari…Are publications on zoological taxonomy under attack? (2021)Are publications on zoologica…Access to scientific literature by the conservation community (2020)Access to scientific literatu…A Paywall Coming Down, Another Being Erected: Open Access Article Processing Charges (APC) may Prevent Some Researchers from Publishing in Leading Journals (2020)A Paywall Coming Down, Anothe…Open access publishing and soil science – Trends and developments (2019)Open access publishing and so…Open access principles and practices benefit conservation (2019)Open access principles and pr…The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)The hybrid model for open access publication of scholarly articles: A failed experiment? (2012)The “total cost of publication” in a hybrid open‐access environment: Institutional approaches to funding journal article‐processing charges in combination with subscriptions (2015)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)Scholia, Scientometrics and Wikidata (2017)Evidence of open access of scientific publications in Google Scholar: A large-scale analysis (2018)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)Low income countries have the highest percentages of open access publication: A systematic computational analysis of the biomedical literature (2019)Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles (2006)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Bibliometric Analysis of Soil Science as a Scientific Area (2020)Global soil science research on drylands: an analysis of research evolution, collaboration, and trends (2021)Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research (2010)Who's downloading pirated papers? Everyone (2016)Open access movement in the scholarly world: Pathways for libraries in developing countries (2023)We need to rethink the way we identify diamond open access journals in quantitative science studies (2024)Estimating the predictability of questionable open-access journals (2025)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Global inequity in scientific names and who they honor (2020)Framing the future for taxonomic monography: Improving recognition, support, and access (2022)The rise of hyperprolific authors in computer science: characterization and implications (2023)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure (2012)Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact (2012)The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017)Is open access affordable? Why current models do not work and why we need internet‐era transformation of scholarly communications (2019)Making Open Science Work for Science and Society (2019)Open Access uptake by universities worldwide (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013Open access: The true cost of science publishing524 cited
  • 2012A study of open access journals using article processing charges358 cited
  • 2011Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal262 cited
  • 2018Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature176 cited
  • 2018Radical open-access plan could spell end to journal subscriptions155 cited

Cited by

  • 2021Are publications on zoological taxonomy under attack?31 cited
  • 2020A Paywall Coming Down, Another Being Erected: Open Access Article Processing Charges (APC) may Prevent Some Researchers from Publishing in Leading Journals25 cited
  • 2024Does it pay to pay? A comparison of the benefits of open-access publishing across various sub-fields in biology22 cited
  • 2019Open access principles and practices benefit conservation16 cited
  • 2019Open access publishing and soil science – Trends and developments13 cited
  • 2020Access to scientific literature by the conservation community10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work