Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Reporting Quality of Systematic Review Abstracts Published in Leading Neurosurgical Journals: A Research on Research Study

16 references·10 citing·40 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,776 cited
2014The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses17,633 cited
2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration17,627 cited
2011GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence8,270 cited
2010Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?1,185 cited
2013PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts706 cited
2008CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration670 cited
2003Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality?584 cited
1990More Informative Abstracts Revisited524 cited
2004Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey422 cited
2012Misrepresentation of Randomized Controlled Trials in Press Releases and News Coverage: A Cohort Study293 cited
2011Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial291 cited
1987A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

240 cited

2012Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis235 cited

2008The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: Survey of major general medical journals133 cited

2003Development and evaluation of a quality score for abstracts119 cited

Cited by

2020Reporting quality of systematic review abstracts in operative dentistry: An assessment using the PRISMA for Abstracts guidelines38 cited
2021Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses related to the treatment of proximal humeral fractures34 cited
2020Evaluation of Spin in the Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Focused on the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris: Cross-Sectional Analysis25 cited
2021Do not make clinical decisions based on abstracts of healthcare research: A systematic review24 cited
2021Evaluation of Spin in the Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Covering Treatments for Achilles Tendon Ruptures23 cited
2022Assessing journal author guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: findings from an institutional sample19 cited
2019Conference abstracts describing systematic reviews on pain were selectively published, not reliable, and poorly reported18 cited
2020Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses covering surgical management, or quality of life after surgical management, of osteoarthritis of the knee13 cited
2020Quality of Literature Searches Published in Leading Neurosurgical Journals: A Review of Reviews13 cited
2022Registration and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews on Surgical Intervention: A Meta-epidemiological Study12 cited