this work references cited by second hopReferences
- 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
- 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
- 2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses63,086 cited
- 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
- 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
- 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
- 2011GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence8,270 cited
- 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
- 2022Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review1,173 cited
- 2013Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews949 cited
- 2013Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review443 cited
- 2007Data Extraction Errors in Meta-analyses That Use Standardized Mean Differences237 cited
Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work