SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Legal Probabilism: A Qualified Defence · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleLegal Probabilism: A Qualified Defence

Brian Hedden2019

Article2019

Legal Probabilism: A Qualified Defence

Brian Hedden · Mark Colyvan

44 citations·0/0 files stored·Journal of Political Philosophy

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Philosophical Ethics and Theory Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies Political Philosophy and Ethics

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 44 citations exist upstream.

References

2015Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2000Knowledge and Its Limits 1955Fact, Fiction, and Forecast.1977The Probable and The Provable 1971Trial by Mathematics: Precision and Ritual in the Legal Process 2013Belief, credence, and norms 2007The reference class problem is your problem too 2012Statistical Evidence, Sensitivity, and the Legal Value of Knowledge

Cited by

2024The Philosophy of Legal Proof 2020Recent work on the proof paradox 2020Inference to the Best Explanation, Relative Plausibility, and Probability

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2020Recent work on the proof paradoxarticle · 8 shared references 2024The Philosophy of Legal Proofbook · 7 shared references 2017When Does Evidence Suffice for Conviction?article · 6 shared references 2016The Burdens of Proofbook · 6 shared references 2018Can there be a burden of the best explanation?article · 6 shared references 2021Does legal epistemology rest on a mistake? On fetishism, two‐tier system design, and conscientious fact‐findingarticle · 6 shared references

Details

Year2019

Typearticle

Published2019-02-08

VenueJournal of Political Philosophy

ISSN-L0963-8016

Languageen

Citations44

Files0 public / 0

ShelfPhilosophical Ethics and Theory

Identifiers

doi10.1111/jopp.12180

openalex_workW2912201260

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.