SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Core Domain Set Selection According to OMERACT Filter 2.1: The OMERACT Methodology
7 references·1 citing·36 second hop
Core Domain Set Selection According to OMERACT Filter 2.1: The OMERACT Methodology (2019)Core Domain Set Selection According to OM…OMERACT Filter 2.1: Elaboration of the Conceptual Framework for Outcome Measurement in Health Intervention Studies (2019)OMERACT Filter 2.1: Elaborati…Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design : Choosing Among Five Approaches (2017)Qualitative Inquiry and Resea…Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement (2016)Core Outcome Set–STAndards fo…Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0 (2014)Developing Core Outcome Measu…Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)Developing core outcome sets …What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies (2009)What is an adequate sample si…Qualitative Research: Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research (1995)Qualitative Research: Reachin…Instrument Selection Using the OMERACT Filter 2.1: The OMERACT Methodology (2019)Instrument Selection Using th…THE DISCOVERY OF GROUNDED THEORY: STRATEGIES FOR QUALITATIVE RESEARCH. By Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1967. 271 pp. $6.75 (1968)The theory of planned behavior (1991)How Many Interviews Are Enough? (2005)Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization (2017)To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales (2019)Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests (2021)Linking Clinical Variables With Health-Related Quality of Life (1995)The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010)The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes (2010)How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline (2016)A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery (2017)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)The research act (1978)Quantity and Quality in Social Research. (1990)Dilemmas in qualitative health research (2000)Qualitative and Mixed Methods Provide Unique Contributions to Outcomes Research (2009)Characteristics of Qualitative Descriptive Studies: A Systematic Review (2016)Mixing Methods: qualitative and quantitative research (2017)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument (2016)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations (2017)ACCORD (ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document): A reporting guideline for consensus methods in biomedicine developed via a modified Delphi (2024)Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist (2011)Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024 (2024)Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024 (2024)Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis (1980)Linking Clinical Variables With Health-Related Quality of Life (1995)Generating a list of potentially important contextual factors covering randomized trials, cohorts, and measurement property studies: An OMERACT initiative (2024)Systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): table templates for effective communication (2025)Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period (2018)Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? (2018)The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2017Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design : Choosing Among Five Approaches16,035 cited
  • 2009What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies3,952 cited
  • 1995Qualitative Research: Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research2,365 cited
  • 2012Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider1,659 cited
  • 2014Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0788 cited
  • 2016Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement650 cited
  • 2019OMERACT Filter 2.1: Elaboration of the Conceptual Framework for Outcome Measurement in Health Intervention Studies141 cited

Cited by

  • 2019Instrument Selection Using the OMERACT Filter 2.1: The OMERACT Methodology97 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work