SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reliable novelty: New should not trump true
16 references·8 citing·39 second hop
Reliable novelty: New should not trump true (2019)Reliable novelty: New should not trump tr…Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature (2017)Empirical assessment of publi…The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications (2016)The Prevalence of Inappropria…The natural selection of bad science (2016)The natural selection of bad …Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level (2016)Relative Citation Ratio (RCR)…Risk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for Improvement (2015)Risk of Bias in Reports of In…The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating the Quality of Empirical Journals with Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power (2014)The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating…Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Power failure: why small samp…Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)Open access: The true cost of…Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Deep impact: unintended conse…The Impact Factor Game (2006)The Impact Factor GameImpact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? (2003)Impact factor: a valid measur…The counting house (2002)The counting houseJournal impact factor: a brief review. (1999)Journal impact factor: a brie…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Why the impact factor of jour…The skewness of science (1992)The skewness of scienceConfirmation Bias in a Simulated Research Environment: An Experimental Study of Scientific Inference (1977)Confirmation Bias in a Simula…Sustainable scientific publishing: a pilot survey on stakeholder motivations and opinions (2024)Sustainable scientific publis…Mastodon over Mammon: towards publicly owned scholarly knowledge (2023)Mastodon over Mammon: towards…What Kinesiology Research is Most Visible to the Academic World? (2022)What Kinesiology Research is …Sustained software development, not number of citations or journal choice, is indicative of accurate bioinformatic software (2022)Sustained software developmen…Make like a glass frog: In support of increased transparency in herpetology (2021)Make like a glass frog: In su…Make like a glass frog: In support of increased transparency in herpetology (2020)Make like a glass frog: In su…Ten myths around open scholarly publishing (2019)Ten myths around open scholar…Sustained software development, not number of citations or journal choice, is indicative of accurate bioinformatic software (2016)Sustained software developmen…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences (2007)Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Sample Size Justification (2022)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Dual Space Search During Scientific Reasoning (1988)The Role of Anomalous Data in Knowledge Acquisition: A Theoretical Framework and Implications for Science Instruction (1993)Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks (2002)The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2013)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (1990)Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (1991)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables (2019)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Ten simple rules for conducting umbrella reviews (2018)Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields (2017)Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists (2019)Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor (2008)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics (2018)A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures (2009)Application of bibliometrics in medicine: a historical bibliometrics analysis (2020)Bibliometric Indicators and Analysis of Research Systems (1997)Do open access articles have greater citation impact?A critical review of the literature (2007)The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience7,634 cited
  • 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
  • 2016The natural selection of bad science858 cited
  • 1999Journal impact factor: a brief review.760 cited
  • 2017Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature760 cited
  • 1992The skewness of science713 cited
  • 2003Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality?584 cited
  • 2013Open access: The true cost of science publishing524 cited
  • 1977Confirmation Bias in a Simulated Research Environment: An Experimental Study of Scientific Inference519 cited
  • 2016Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level499 cited
  • 2002The counting house447 cited
  • 2013Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank440 cited
  • 2014The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating the Quality of Empirical Journals with Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power405 cited
  • 2006The Impact Factor Game372 cited
  • 2015Risk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for Improvement

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

358 cited
  • 2016The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications287 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2019Ten myths around open scholarly publishing24 cited
    • 2022Sustained software development, not number of citations or journal choice, is indicative of accurate bioinformatic software22 cited
    • 2016Sustained software development, not number of citations or journal choice, is indicative of accurate bioinformatic software16 cited
    • 2024Sustainable scientific publishing: a pilot survey on stakeholder motivations and opinions16 cited
    • 2023Mastodon over Mammon: towards publicly owned scholarly knowledge13 cited
    • 2022What Kinesiology Research is Most Visible to the Academic World?13 cited
    • 2021Make like a glass frog: In support of increased transparency in herpetology7 cited
    • 2020Make like a glass frog: In support of increased transparency in herpetology7 cited