SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How Do Legal Experts Cope With Medical Reports and Forensic Evidence? The Experiences, Perceptions, and Narratives of Swiss Judges and Other Legal Experts
16 references·0 citing·49 second hop
How Do Legal Experts Cope With Medical Reports and Forensic Evidence? The Experiences, Perceptions, and Narratives of Swiss Judges and Other Legal Experts (2019)How Do Legal Experts Cope With Medical Re…The cognitive underpinnings of bias in forensic mental health evaluations. (2014)The cognitive underpinnings o…Scientific Literacy: The Role of Goal-Directed Reading and Evaluation in Understanding Scientific Information (2014)Scientific Literacy: The Role…The Initial Field Trials of DSM-5: New Blooms and Old Thorns (2013)The Initial Field Trials of D…Neuroscientists in court (2013)Neuroscientists in courtImpact Factor Distortions (2013)Impact Factor DistortionsAre Forensic Experts Biased by the Side That Retained Them? (2013)Are Forensic Experts Biased b…Specialty guidelines for forensic psychology. (2012)Specialty guidelines for fore…PISA 2009 Assessment Framework: Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science. (2009)PISA 2009 Assessment Framewor…Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Consolidated criteria for rep…Asking the gatekeepers: A national survey of judges on judging expert evidence in a post-Daubert world. (2001)Asking the gatekeepers: A nat…The effects of peer review and evidence quality on judge evaluations of psychological science: Are judges effective gatekeepers? (2000)The effects of peer review an…Reasoning about scientific evidence: Effects of juror gender and evidence quality on juror decisions in a hostile work environment case. (1999)Reasoning about scientific ev…Qualitative Research: Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research (1995)Qualitative Research: Reachin…Progress Toward Achieving a Common Language in Psychiatry (1993)Progress Toward Achieving a C…The Expert Witness in Psychology and Psychiatry (1988)The Expert Witness in Psychol…The effects of graduate training on reasoning: Formal discipline and thinking about everyday-life events. (1988)The effects of graduate train…Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment (1971)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. (1979)The Accuracy of Predictions of Violence to Others (1993)Accent, standard language ideology, and discriminatory pretext in the courts (1994)Assessing predictions of violence: Being accurate about accuracy. (1994)Behavioral sciences and the law. (1966)Modern scientific evidence : the law and science of expert testimony (2006)Gold versus platinum: Do jurors recognize the superiority and limitations of DNA evidence compared to other types of forensic evidence? (2008)Kumho,Daubert, and the Nature of Scientific Inquiry: Implications for Forensic Anthropology* (2008)Writing history in international criminal trials (2012)Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (2009)DSM-5 Field Trials in the United States and Canada, Part II: Test-Retest Reliability of Selected Categorical Diagnoses (2013)DSM-5 Field Trials in the United States and Canada, Part III: Development and Reliability Testing of a Cross-Cutting Symptom Assessment for DSM-5 (2013)A Roadmap for the Development of Applied Computational Psychiatry (2016)Psychology's Replication Crisis and Clinical Psychological Science (2019)Identifying Transdiagnostic Mechanisms in Mental Health Using Computational Factor Modeling (2022)The growth of logical thinking: From childhood to adolescence. (1958)The processes of causal attribution. (1973)Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior (1987)Advanced social psychology (1993)Assessing the Effectiveness of Critical Thinking Instruction (2001)Giving Debiasing Away: Can Psychological Research on Correcting Cognitive Errors Promote Human Welfare? (2009)The research act (1978)Quantity and Quality in Social Research. (1990)Dilemmas in qualitative health research (2000)Qualitative and Mixed Methods Provide Unique Contributions to Outcomes Research (2009)Characteristics of Qualitative Descriptive Studies: A Systematic Review (2016)Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. (2000)Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (2009)The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. (2009)Cognitive bias research in forensic science: A systematic review (2019)Linear Sequential Unmasking–Expanded (LSU-E): A general approach for improving decision making as well as minimizing noise and bias (2021)Toward Parsimony in Bias Research: A Proposed Common Framework of Belief-Consistent Information Processing for a Set of Biases (2023)Handbook of Qualitative Research (1994)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study (2013)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Thematic Analysis (2017)Scientific Literacy and Student Attitudes: Perspectives from PISA 2006 science (2011)Fostering Scientific Literacy and Critical Thinking in Elementary Science Education (2014)Assessment and learning: fields apart? (2017)Using Publication Metrics to Highlight Academic Productivity and Research Impact (2014)The Journal Impact Factor: A Brief History, Critique, and Discussion of Adverse Effects (2019)Qualitative Research Methods (2021)Psychological Assessment of Symptom and Performance Validity, Response Bias, and Malingering: Official Position of the Association for Scientific Advancement in Psychological Injury and Law (2014)Adversarial Allegiance among Expert Witnesses (2015)Assessing Negative Response Bias Using Self-Report Measures: New Articles, New Issues (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups42,389 cited
  • 1995Qualitative Research: Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research2,336 cited
  • 2009PISA 2009 Assessment Framework: Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science.479 cited
  • 2012Specialty guidelines for forensic psychology.447 cited
  • 2013Impact Factor Distortions386 cited
  • 1988The effects of graduate training on reasoning: Formal discipline and thinking about everyday-life events.341 cited
  • 1988The Expert Witness in Psychology and Psychiatry314 cited
  • 2013The Initial Field Trials of DSM-5: New Blooms and Old Thorns295 cited
  • 2013Are Forensic Experts Biased by the Side That Retained Them?286 cited
  • 2001Asking the gatekeepers: A national survey of judges on judging expert evidence in a post-Daubert world.252 cited
  • 1993Progress Toward Achieving a Common Language in Psychiatry195 cited
  • 2014Scientific Literacy: The Role of Goal-Directed Reading and Evaluation in Understanding Scientific Information175 cited
  • 2000The effects of peer review and evidence quality on judge evaluations of psychological science: Are judges effective gatekeepers?143 cited
  • 2014The cognitive underpinnings of bias in forensic mental health evaluations.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

129 cited
  • 2013Neuroscientists in court119 cited
  • 1999Reasoning about scientific evidence: Effects of juror gender and evidence quality on juror decisions in a hostile work environment case.107 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.