No Free Lunch — What Price Plan S for Scientific Publishing?

Charlotte J. Haug

43 citations0/0 files storedNew England Journal of Medicine

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic Publishing and Open Access Publishing and Scholarly Communication scientometrics and bibliometrics research

Abstract

No Free Lunch The evidence to date does not confirm the hypothesis that the Gold Open Access publication model will advance science and be an unprecedented public good. So this is a surprising time to insist that scientific content should be “free” online, as Europe’s Plan S aims to do.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 43 citations exist upstream.

References

2016The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review 2012Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003)2018Radical open-access plan could spell end to journal subscriptions

Cited by

2020Research and open access from low‐ and middle‐income countries 2019Scientific Authors in a Changing World of Scholarly Communication: What Does the Future Hold?2019Open Access Publishing in India: Coverage, Relevance, and Future Perspectives 2023The Changing Medical Publishing Industry: Economics, Expansion, and Equity 2019Effects of journal choice on the visibility of scientific publications: a comparison between subscription-based and full Open Access models 2021The International Development of Open Access Publishing: A Comparative Empirical Analysis Over Seven World Regions and Nine Academic Disciplines 2023Language Barriers in Organismal Biology: What Can Journals Do Better?2019The open access citation premium may depend on the openness and inclusiveness of the indexing database, but the relationship is controversial because it is ambiguous where the open access boundary lies

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.