SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Four Perspectives on What Matters for the Ethics of Automated Vehicles
15 references·1 citing·41 second hop
Four Perspectives on What Matters for the Ethics of Automated Vehicles (2019)Four Perspectives on What Matters for the…Never Mind the Trolley: The Ethics of Autonomous Vehicles in Mundane Situations (2018)Never Mind the Trolley: The E…Meaningful Human Control over Autonomous Systems: A Philosophical Account (2018)Meaningful Human Control over…The Ethical Knob: ethically-customisable automated vehicles and the law (2017)The Ethical Knob: ethically-c…Killing by Autonomous Vehicles and the Legal Doctrine of Necessity (2017)Killing by Autonomous Vehicle…Attributing Agency to Automated Systems: Reflections on Human–Robot Collaborations and Responsibility-Loci (2017)Attributing Agency to Automat…A Rawlsian algorithm for autonomous vehicles (2017)A Rawlsian algorithm for auto…The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles (2016)The social dilemma of autonom…The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)The ethics of algorithms: Map…The Ethics of Accident-Algorithms for Self-Driving Cars: an Applied Trolley Problem? (2016)The Ethics of Accident-Algori…Away from Trolley Problems and Toward Risk Management (2016)Away from Trolley Problems an…Technology as Moral Proxy: Autonomy and Paternalism by Design (2015)Technology as Moral Proxy: Au…Responsibility for Crashes of Autonomous Vehicles: An Ethical Analysis (2014)Responsibility for Crashes of…Machine Ethics and Automated Vehicles (2014)Machine Ethics and Automated …The H-Metaphor as a Guideline for Vehicle Automation and Interaction (2013)The H-Metaphor as a Guideline…The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata (2004)The responsibility gap: Ascri…Do We Collaborate With What We Design? (2023)Do We Collaborate With What W…Human factors in hazardous situations (1991)Principles Of Gestalt Psychology (2013)Engineering Psychology and Human Performance (2015)Human–Vehicle Cooperation in Automated Driving: A Multidisciplinary Review and Appraisal (2019)Decision-making in driver-automation shared control: A review and perspectives (2020)How to Increase Automated Vehicles’ Acceptance through In-Vehicle Interaction Design: A Review (2021)A Theory of Justice (1971)From ‘automation’ to ‘autonomy’: the importance of trust repair in human–machine interaction (2018)How trust can drive forward the user acceptance to the technology? In-vehicle technology for autonomous vehicle (2018)Ethical issues in focus by the autonomous vehicles industry (2021)A theory of justice original editionThe Trolley Problem (1985)Moral machines: teaching robots right from wrong (2009)IoT and AI for Smart Government: A Research Agenda (2019)Truth and Method (1960)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2015)Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI (2019)Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions (2020)The Second-Person Standpoint (2007)Moral Machines (2009)Self-Constitution (2009)Responsibility for Killer Robots (2019)There Is No Techno-Responsibility Gap (2020)Artificial intelligence and responsibility gaps: what is the problem? (2022)Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? (1963)Philosophical Explanations. (1983)Embedding Values in Artificial Intelligence (AI) Systems (2020)Four Responsibility Gaps with Artificial Intelligence: Why they Matter and How to Address them (2021)A sociotechnical perspective for the future of AI: narratives, inequalities, and human control (2022)Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem (1976)Algorithmic Decision-Making in AVs: Understanding Ethical and Technical Concerns for Smart Cities (2019)Why Trolley Problems Matter for the Ethics of Automated Vehicles (2019)Artificial Intelligence, Responsibility Attribution, and a Relational Justification of Explainability (2019)From What to How: An Initial Review of Publicly Available AI Ethics Tools, Methods and Research to Translate Principles into Practices (2019)Artificial Intelligence and the Public Sector—Applications and Challenges (2018)In AI We Trust: Ethics, Artificial Intelligence, and Reliability (2020)The Ethical Implications of Using Artificial Intelligence in Auditing (2020)Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Relationships with road users, risk, gender and age (2017)Machine behaviour (2019)The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate3,541 cited
  • 2016The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles1,520 cited
  • 2004The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata1,095 cited
  • 2018Meaningful Human Control over Autonomous Systems: A Philosophical Account559 cited
  • 2014Responsibility for Crashes of Autonomous Vehicles: An Ethical Analysis335 cited
  • 2016The Ethics of Accident-Algorithms for Self-Driving Cars: an Applied Trolley Problem?331 cited
  • 2014Machine Ethics and Automated Vehicles243 cited
  • 2017Attributing Agency to Automated Systems: Reflections on Human–Robot Collaborations and Responsibility-Loci241 cited
  • 2013The H-Metaphor as a Guideline for Vehicle Automation and Interaction195 cited
  • 2018Never Mind the Trolley: The Ethics of Autonomous Vehicles in Mundane Situations170 cited
  • 2017A Rawlsian algorithm for autonomous vehicles141 cited
  • 2017The Ethical Knob: ethically-customisable automated vehicles and the law125 cited
  • 2016Away from Trolley Problems and Toward Risk Management124 cited
  • 2017Killing by Autonomous Vehicles and the Legal Doctrine of Necessity106 cited
  • 2015Technology as Moral Proxy: Autonomy and Paternalism by Design

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

48 cited

Cited by

  • 2023Do We Collaborate With What We Design?26 cited