SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
What’s next for Registered Reports?
1 references·16 citing·49 second hop
What’s next for Registered Reports? (2019)What’s next for Registered Reports?Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)Open science challenges, bene…Why research integrity matters and how it can be improved (2023)Why research integrity matter…Open science (2023)Open scienceTen steps toward a better personality science – how quality may be rewarded more in research evaluation (2022)Ten steps toward a better per…Ten simple rules for good research practice (2022)Ten simple rules for good res…Credibility crisis in agricultural economics (2022)Credibility crisis in agricul…Analysis of 567,758 randomized controlled trials published over 30 years reveals trends in phrases used to discuss results that do not reach statistical significance (2022)Analysis of 567,758 randomize…Systematic reviews and meta-analyses for the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury (2021)Systematic reviews and meta-a…Methodology over metrics: current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society (2021)Methodology over metrics: cur…Initial evidence of research quality of registered reports compared with the standard publishing model (2021)Initial evidence of research …The best time to argue about what a replication means? Before you do it (2020)The best time to argue about …Science is not a signal detection problem (2020)Science is not a signal detec…Recommendations for the conduct of systematic reviews in toxicology and environmental health research (COSTER) (2020)Recommendations for the condu…Preregistration of exploratory research: Learning from the golden age of discovery (2020)Preregistration of explorator…Open Science and Radical Solutions for Diversity, Equity and Quality in Research: A Literature Review of Different Research Schools, Philosophies and Frameworks and Their Potential Impact on Science and Education (2020)Open Science and Radical Solu…Ensuring the quality and specificity of preregistrations (2020)Ensuring the quality and spec…The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture (2019)The psychology of experimenta…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences (2007)Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011)Moving Sport and Exercise Science Forward: A Call for the Adoption of More Transparent Research Practices (2020)Why most psychological research findings are not even wrong (2022)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)Jupyter Notebooks – a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows (2016)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)The past, present and future of Registered Reports (2021)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Functional organisation for verb generation in children with developmental language disorder (2020)Citation Patterns Following a Strongly Contradictory Replication Result: Four Case Studies From Psychology (2021)ManyBirds: A multi-site collaborative Open Science approach to avian cognition and behavior research (2022)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)A Signal Detection Approach to Understanding the Identification of Fake News (2021)A Touching Connection: How Observing Robotic Touch Can Affect Human Trust in a Robot (2021)RETRACTED ARTICLE: High replicability of newly discovered social-behavioural findings is achievable (2023)Robust research needs many lines of evidence (2018)Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints (2019)Biosecurity in an age of open science (2022)The benefits of preregistration and Registered Reports (2024)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Literature searching methods or guidance and their application to public health topics: A narrative review (2021)The methodological rigour of systematic reviews in environmental health (2022)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Promoting an open research culture (2015)Why methods matter in a meta-analysis: a reappraisal showed inconclusive injury preventive effect of Nordic hamstring exercise (2021)An observational analysis of the trope “A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant” and other cut-and-paste statistical methods (2022)Tolerating bad health research: the continuing scandal (2022)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Big little lies: a compendium and simulation of p -hacking strategies (2023)Positionality and Its Problems: Questioning the Value of Reflexivity Statements in Research (2023)The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes (2023)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The weirdest people in the world? (2010)Responsible Research Assessment II: A specific proposal for hiring and promotion in psychology (2022)Challenges and actions towards a more comprehensive developmental science (2025)Theory and Model Building in Psychology: Mapping the Current Debate (2026)The Replication Recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? (2013)Open access publishing in an African context: Notable improvements and recurring challenges (2025)Global North-South science inequalities due to language and funding barriers (2026)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2019Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond605 cited

Cited by

  • 2021Initial evidence of research quality of registered reports compared with the standard publishing model278 cited
  • 2020Ensuring the quality and specificity of preregistrations138 cited
  • 2019The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture108 cited
  • 2021Methodology over metrics: current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society105 cited
  • 2020Recommendations for the conduct of systematic reviews in toxicology and environmental health research (COSTER)91 cited
  • 2020Preregistration of exploratory research: Learning from the golden age of discovery81 cited
  • 2023Open science63 cited
  • 2020Science is not a signal detection problem56 cited
  • 2022Ten steps toward a better personality science – how quality may be rewarded more in research evaluation54 cited
  • 2022Ten simple rules for good research practice47 cited
  • 2020The best time to argue about what a replication means? Before you do it47 cited
  • 2023Why research integrity matters and how it can be improved47 cited
  • 2022Credibility crisis in agricultural economics44 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2022Analysis of 567,758 randomized controlled trials published over 30 years reveals trends in phrases used to discuss results that do not reach statistical significance43 cited
  • 2020Open Science and Radical Solutions for Diversity, Equity and Quality in Research: A Literature Review of Different Research Schools, Philosophies and Frameworks and Their Potential Impact on Science and Education40 cited
  • 2021Systematic reviews and meta-analyses for the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury39 cited