Editorial Peer Review: Its Strengths and Weaknesses

Cindy Hepfer

81 citations0/0 files storedSerials Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Writing and Publishing Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

Editorial Peer Review: Its Strengths and Weaknesses provides a “systematic review of published studies on the editorial peer review process” (p. xii). Author Ann C. Weller considers a staggering 1,...

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 81 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2012A Labour of Love? Academics in Business Schools 2017The extent of South African authored articles in predatory journals 2013Biological Importance and Statistical Significance 2010Quality and Peer Review of Research: An Adjudicating Role for Editors 2008Selecting manuscripts for a high‐impact journal through peer review: A citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere 2008The Effectiveness of the Peer Review Process: Inter‐Referee Agreement and Predictive Validity of Manuscript Refereeing at Angewandte Chemie 2005Is peer review in crisis?2008Refereeing the Game of Peer Review

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.