SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematic review of clinical outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials of burn care
12 references·0 citing·43 second hopsampled
Systematic review of clinical outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials of burn care (2019)Systematic review of clinical outcome rep…The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)The COMET Handbook: version 1…Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations (2017)Core Outcome Set-STAndards fo…A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery (2017)A taxonomy has been developed…Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement (2016)Core Outcome Set–STAndards fo…Survey of new 2007 and 2011 Cochrane reviews found 37% of prespecified outcomes not reported (2014)Survey of new 2007 and 2011 C…Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0 (2014)Developing Core Outcome Measu…Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)Developing core outcome sets …Using the Delphi Technique to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials: Recommendations for the Future Based on a Systematic Review of Existing Studies (2011)Using the Delphi Technique to…Characteristics of meta-analyses and their component studies in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: a cross-sectional, descriptive analysis (2011)Characteristics of meta-analy…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews (2007)Standardising outcomes for cl…Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (2004)Outcome reporting bias in ran…An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts (1963)Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique (2000)The Use of the Delphi and Other Consensus Group Methods in Medical Education Research: A Review (2017)The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus (2020)Preparing, conducting, and analyzing Delphi surveys: Cross-disciplinary practices, new directions, and advancements (2021)Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes (1995)The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010)The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes (2010)Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain (2015)Developing a Set of Core Outcomes for Trials in Hemodialysis: An International Delphi Survey (2017)Reporting results of cancer treatment (1981)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2008)Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative: protocol for an international Delphi study to achieve consensus on how to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a ‘core outcome set’ (2014)Core Outcome Measures for Clinical Research in Acute Respiratory Failure Survivors. An International Modified Delphi Consensus Study (2017)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument (2016)Guidelines for Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trial Protocols (2018)Statistical Methods for Examining Heterogeneity and Combining Results from Several Studies in Meta‐Analysis (2001)Meta‐Analysis Of Controlled Clinical Trials (2002)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)A systematic review identifies a lack of standardization in methods for handling missing variance data (2006)STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association studies (STREGA) – an extension of the STROBE statement (2009)STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA)—an extension of the STROBE statement (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items: the COS-STAP Statement (2019)Core outcomes in neonatology: development of a core outcome set for neonatal research (2019)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures version 2.0 (2024)How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline (2016)Higher number of items associated with significantly lower response rates in COS Delphi surveys (2018)A core outcome set for pre‐eclampsia research: an international consensus development study (2020)Linking Clinical Variables With Health-Related Quality of Life (1995)Systematic scoping review identifies heterogeneity in outcomes measured in adolescent depression clinical trials (2020)The Use of Music in the Treatment and Management of Serious Mental Illness: A Global Scoping Review of the Literature (2021)Evaluating Conversational Agents for Mental Health: Scoping Review of Outcomes and Outcome Measurement Instruments (2023)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 2017The COMET Handbook: version 1.02,006 cited
  • 2012Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider1,659 cited
  • 2011Using the Delphi Technique to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials: Recommendations for the Future Based on a Systematic Review of Existing Studies891 cited
  • 2017Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations791 cited
  • 2014Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0781 cited
  • 2016Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement650 cited
  • 2017A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery623 cited
  • 2007Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews482 cited
  • 2004Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research442 cited
  • 2011Characteristics of meta-analyses and their component studies in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: a cross-sectional, descriptive analysis403 cited
  • 2014Survey of new 2007 and 2011 Cochrane reviews found 37% of prespecified outcomes not reported44 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work